SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2412.13357

On Stable Approximation Algorithms for Geometric Coverage Problems

Abstract

Let $P$ be a set of points in the plane and let $m$ be an integer. The goal of Max Cover by Unit Disks problem is to place $m$ unit disks whose union covers the maximum number of points from~$P$. We are interested in the dynamic version of Max Cover by Unit Disks problem, where the points in $P$ appear and disappear over time, and the algorithm must maintain a set \cDalg of $m$ disks whose union covers many points. A dynamic algorithm for this problem is a $k$-stable $\alpha$-approximation algorithm when it makes at most $k$ changes to \cDalg upon each update to the set $P$ and the number of covered points at time $t$ is always at least $\alpha \cdot \opt(t)$, where $\opt(t)$ is the maximum number of points that can be covered by m disks at time $t$. We show that for any constant $\varepsilon>0$, there is a $k_{\varepsilon}$-stable $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for the dynamic Max Cover by Unit Disks problem, where $k_{\varepsilon}=O(1/\varepsilon^3)$. This improves the stability of $\Theta(1/\eps^4)$ that can be obtained by combining results of Chaplick, De, Ravsky, and Spoerhase (ESA 2018) and De~Berg, Sadhukhan, and Spieksma (APPROX 2023). Our result extends to other fat similarly-sized objects used in the covering, such as arbitrarily-oriented unit squares, or arbitrarily-oriented fat ellipses of fixed diameter. We complement the above result by showing that the restriction to fat objects is necessary to obtain a SAS. To this end, we study the Max Cover by Unit Segments problem, where the goal is to place $m$ unit-length segments whose union covers the maximum number of points from $P$. We show that there is a constant $\varepsilon^* > 0$ such that any $k$-stable $(1 + \varepsilon^*)$-approximation algorithm must have $k=\Omega(m)$, even when the point set never has more than four collinear points.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mark de Berg, Arpan Sadhukhan. 2024-12-17. On Stable Approximation Algorithms for Geometric Coverage Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13357

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG