Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2508.08045

Constrained Distributed Heterogeneous Two-Facility Location Problems with Max-Variant Cost

Xinru Xu·Wenjing Liu·Qizhi Fang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study a constrained distributed heterogeneous two-facility location problem, where a set of agents with private locations on the real line are divided into disjoint groups. The constraint means that the facilities can only be built in a given multiset of candidate locations and at most one facility can be built at each candidate location. Given the locations of the two facilities, the cost of an agent is the distance from her location to the farthest facility (referred to as max-variant). Our goal is to design strategyproof distributed mechanisms that can incentivize all agents to truthfully report their locations and approximately optimize some social objective. A distributed mechanism consists of two steps: for each group, the mechanism chooses two candidate locations as the representatives of the group based only on the locations reported by agents therein; then, it outputs two facility locations among all the representatives. We focus on a class of deterministic strategyproof distributed mechanisms and analyze upper and lower bounds on the distortion under the Average-of-Average cost (average of the average individual cost of agents in each group), the Max-of-Max cost (maximum individual cost among all agents), the Average-of-Max cost (average of the maximum individual cost among all agents in each group) and the Max-of-Average cost (maximum of the average individual cost of all agents in each group). Under four social objectives, we obtain constant upper and lower distortion bounds.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xinru Xu, Wenjing Liu, Qizhi Fang. 2025-08-11. Constrained Distributed Heterogeneous Two-Facility Location Problems with Max-Variant Cost. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08045

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗