arXiv · 2509.13220
Dynamic or Systematic? Bayesian model selection between dark energy and supernova biases
Abstract
The Dark Energy Survey 5-year (DES-5Y) supernovae, combined with Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) baryon acoustic oscillations, appear to favour Chevallier-Polarski-Linder $(w_0, w_a)$ dynamical dark energy over $\Lambda$CDM. It has been suggested in other work that this is driven by a systematic in the DES pipeline, which particularly affects the low-redshift supernovae brought in from legacy surveys. It is difficult to investigate these data in isolation, however, as the complicated supernovae pipelines must properly account for selection effects. In this work, we discover that a magnitude offset between the low- and high-redshift supernovae is favoured by the Bayesian evidence over the flexknot dark energy found in our previous work. In addition, we find that the possible tension between DES-5Y and DESI is significantly reduced by such an offset. The recent DES-Dovekie recalibration partially alleviates this tension, but does not eliminate it. We also take the opportunity to trial Nested Bridge Sampling with Sequential Monte Carlo as an alternative method for calculating Bayes factors.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
A. N. Ormondroyd, W. J. Handley, M. P. Hobson, A. N. Lasenby, D. Yallup. 2025-09-16. Dynamic or Systematic? Bayesian model selection between dark energy and supernova biases. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras%2Fstag615
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.