SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.18392

When Mobile Crowdsourcing Meets Queueing Systems: Human-in-the-Loop Learning

Abstract

In service systems, customers now rely on congestion information before deciding which queue or server to join, from restaurants and theme-park attractions to road networks. We study this setting as human-in-the-loop learning (HILL), where customers both consume and generate time-sensitive congestion information through crowdsourcing platforms. Because congestion reports become stale, efficient system operation requires continued exploration of servers whose current states are uncertain. Yet selfish customers avoid such exploration when it reduces their immediate service utility, even though their observations would benefit future customers. We analyze this tension between individual incentives and system-wide learning in queueing systems with endogenous congestion. We first show that myopic server choices can induce an infinite price of anarchy (PoA): decentralized customers may cause arbitrarily large efficiency losses by overexploring servers that are likely congested. In the single-server case, we prove that the lower bound on PoA decreases as buffer size grows, while in the multi-server case the upper bound decreases as the number of servers increases. We further show that existing informational, non-monetary mechanisms for exploration-exploitation with exogenous information fail in our setting, as customers' choices directly reshape the queue states and still lead to infinite PoA. To address this challenge, we design a dynamic side-payment mechanism that periodically charges some customers and rewards others, discouraging excessive exploration while maintaining ex-post budget balance. The mechanism coordinates congestion management and information acquisition across heterogeneous servers, and guarantees PoA below 2. Beyond worst-case analysis, experiments using real datasets demonstrate that the proposed mechanism also achieves strong average-case performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hongbo Li, Lingjie Duan, Ness B. Shroff. 2026-06-16. When Mobile Crowdsourcing Meets Queueing Systems: Human-in-the-Loop Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18392

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT