arXiv · 2607.23175
Beyond a Global Norm: Personalizing Toxicity Sensitivity in Language Models Without Retraining
Abstract
Reducing toxicity is often framed as a global alignment problem, yet perceptions of harmful language are subjective and context-dependent. We present the first comparative evaluation of training-free methods for aligning language generation to user-specific toxicity sensitivities across three inference-time intervention stages: pre-decoding (prompt conditioning and rewriting), in-decoding (token, logit, and representation steering), and post-decoding (candidate re-ranking). Evaluated against toxicity sensitivity targets derived from the PRISM dataset, all methods reduce alignment error by 28-47%. However, the results reveal a fundamental trade-off between alignment effectiveness, personalization, and general language quality, showing how toxicity sensitivity alignment is an inherently multi-objective problem.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Rares A. C. Diaconescu, Iulia Slanina, Alina Florea, Andrei B. Trache, Miruna E. Coroi, Anne Arzberger, Jie Yang, Enrico Liscio. 2026-07-25. Beyond a Global Norm: Personalizing Toxicity Sensitivity in Language Models Without Retraining. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23175
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.