Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.29160

Approximation Algorithms for Geometric Maximum Coverage

Sujoy Bhore·Timothy M. Chan·Pasin Manurangsi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the maximum coverage problem for geometric set systems: given a set of points, a set of geometric objects, and a number $k$, select $k$ objects maximizing the number of points inside their union. - We present a polynomial-time approximation algorithm with approximation factor strictly better than $1-1/e$ for any set system with linear 2-shallow cell complexity (or any set system that can be decomposed into a constant number of such set systems). The result also holds for the weighted maximum coverage problem, where objects have weights and we want to select objects with total weight within a given budget. The result applies to many types of geometric objects, including pseudodisks in 2D, fat axis-aligned rectangles in 2D, similar-size fat triangles in 2D, axis-aligned unit cubes in 3D. - For small $k$, we obtain a $(1-\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm more generally for any set system with constant VC dimension, running in time exponential in $\tilde{O}(k/\epsilon)$. This simplifies and improves Badanidiyuru, Kleinberg, and Lee's parameterized approximation scheme [SoCG'12] running in time exponential in $\tilde{O}(k^2/\epsilon^5)$. - A continuous version of the geometric maximum coverage problem asks for $k$ objects maximizing the volume of their union. We give better approximation algorithms for this problem for certain families of objects; e.g., we obtain an EPTAS for fat convex objects in any constant dimension. - We complement our algorithms with several hardness results, e.g., APX-hardness for fat axis-aligned rectangles in 2D, $(1-1/e+\epsilon)$-approximation hardness for axis-aligned boxes in a dimension dependent on $\epsilon$, and a lower bound ruling out $n^{\mathop{\rm poly}(1/\epsilon)}$-time PTASs for the continuous problem for axis-aligned boxes in 3D.

Explore related subjects

cs.CGcs.CCcs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sujoy Bhore, Timothy M. Chan, Pasin Manurangsi. 2026-07-31. Approximation Algorithms for Geometric Maximum Coverage. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29160

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG↗