LM-X: Explainable Vision--Language--Action Modeling via Progress, Event, and Uncertainty Prediction

Jin Lou; Zhiyuan Jing; Xupeng Wang; Andong Chen; Xingdong Zhu; Yuexuan Li; Yuan Xu; Zhijie Zhu; Yingwei Ji; Wenpeng Nie; Renxing Feng; Liangliang Chen; Ying Chu; Jingyi Li; Jinyan Liu; Zhiqi Song; Jingxuan Zhu; Jidong Zhang; Yufei Liu; Boyang Xing; Lei Jiang; Yan Cui; Hongming Li; Yuchen Zhu

arXiv · 2608.25757

LM-X: Explainable Vision--Language--Action Modeling via Progress, Event, and Uncertainty Prediction

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large-scale vision--language--action (VLA) policies have advanced generalist robot control, yet most remain stimulus-to-action black boxes: actions are exposed, but their explanatory state is not. They provide no native account of three explanatory signals: task progress, the next semantic transition, or local command reliability. Prior work shows that progress and event structure aid long-horizon control and that uncertainty supports monitoring; however, such capabilities are typically added or extracted only after action pretraining. The field therefore lacks a VLA foundation model whose explanatory state is jointly pretrained with control. Drawing on biological sensorimotor organization, in which outcome-sensitive, event-segmented, and probabilistic predictions structure behavior, we introduce LM-X. LM-X learns three directly supervised online signals: return-to-go (RTG) estimates visible progress and state quality; event-to-go (ETG) predicts the action sequence to the next semantic event; and heteroscedastic action-flow variance reports local command reliability. RTG conditions ETG and both condition action generation; uncertainty is estimated inside the action expert, making explanation part of control rather than a post-hoc description. We pretrain LM-X on more than 20,000 hours of heterogeneous real-robot trajectories, including over 1,000 hours of failed rollouts. A controlled gate favors joint over post-hoc training. LM-X achieves 74.1\% success on 50 randomized-hard RoboTwin2.0 tasks and 73.5\% on seven real-robot tasks, compared with 55.4\% and 50.7\% for GR00T N1.7. Its signals track progress and regression, anticipate event-scale motion, detect high-error actions, and provide advance failure warning. These results establish LM-X as an explainable VLA foundation model that couples transparent predictive state with stronger generalist control.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Jin Lou, Zhiyuan Jing, Xupeng Wang, Andong Chen, Xingdong Zhu, Yuexuan Li, Yuan Xu, Zhijie Zhu, Yingwei Ji, Wenpeng Nie, Renxing Feng, Liangliang Chen, Ying Chu, Jingyi Li, Jinyan Liu, Zhiqi Song, Jingxuan Zhu, Jidong Zhang, Yufei Liu, Boyang Xing, Lei Jiang, Yan Cui, Hongming Li, Yuchen Zhu. 2026-08-26. LM-X: Explainable Vision--Language--Action Modeling via Progress, Event, and Uncertainty Prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25757

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗