SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.12325

Almost Empty Monochromatic Triangles With Many Colors

Abstract

Given integers $c\geq 2$ and $s\geq 0$, let $\mathsf{M}_3(c,s)$ denote the least integer such that every set of at least $\mathsf{M}_3(c,s)$ points in the plane, no three on a line, colored with $c$ colors, contains a monochromatic triangle with at most $s$ interior points. Further, let $λ_3(c)$ be the least integer such that $\mathsf{M}_3(c,λ_3(c))<\infty$. \citet{colorempty} proved that, for every $c\geq 2$, $$\left\lfloor\frac{c-1}{2}\right\rfloor \leq λ_3(c)\leq c-2.$$ Later, \citet{cravioto2019almost} improved the upper bound to $c-3$, for $c\geq 4$. In this paper, we refine their argument to obtain the following asymptotic improvement: $$λ_3(c) \leq c-\sqrt{c\log c}+o (\sqrt{c\log c} ),$$ for all sufficiently large $c$. We also show that every $c$-coloring of a sufficiently large Horton set contains a monochromatic triangle with at most $\lfloor \frac{c-1}{2} \rfloor$ interior points. This shows that the aforementioned lower bound on $λ_3(c)$ is sharp within the class of Horton sets. We conclude with a conjecture on the large-color asymptotics of $λ_3(c)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bhaswar B. Bhattacharya, Sandip Das, Sk Samim Islam, Aashirwad Mohapatra, Saumya Sen. 2026-09-21. Almost Empty Monochromatic Triangles With Many Colors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12325

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO