SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.22935

Slow Context, Fast Symptoms: Multiscale Temporal Dynamics and Context-Induced Coupling in Psychological Systems

Abstract

Psychological dynamics unfold across multiple timescales: symptoms and other psychological states can change rapidly, whereas social, environmental, biological, and developmental conditions often evolve more slowly. We formulate this structure as a stochastic slow-fast system in which binary symptom states form a fast interacting network embedded within a slow contextual field. Pairwise symptom coupling governs interactions within the fast layer, while the contextual field shifts symptom-specific activation tendencies and can itself receive feedback from sustained symptom activation. Simulations show that changes in the slow field can shift the macroscopic activation state of the symptom system even when the underlying interaction matrix remains fixed. Perturbations to the field generate transient increases in symptom activation followed by recovery, while feedback between the fast and slow layers delays recovery and, when sufficiently strong, produces dependence on initial conditions. We further show that when between-person variation in the contextual field is omitted from network estimation, the inferred system exhibits stronger total coupling and nonzero couplings between symptom pairs that are uncoupled in the data-generating model. Thus, slowly varying context can alter both the dynamics and the apparent interaction structure of a fast psychological system. The framework connects psychological network models with slow-fast dynamical systems and provides a formal basis for distinguishing changes in activation from changes in coupling.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kyuri Park, Denny Borsboom, Mike H. Lees, Lourens J. Waldorp, Johan Bollen, Vítor V. Vasconcelos. 2026-09-19. Slow Context, Fast Symptoms: Multiscale Temporal Dynamics and Context-Induced Coupling in Psychological Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22935

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quantifying the Dynamics of Innovation Abandonment Across Scientific, Technological, Commercial, and Pharmacological Domains

Despite the vast literature on the diffusion of innovations that impacts a broad range of disciplines, our understanding of the abandonment of innovations remains limited yet is essential for a deeper understanding of the innovation lifecycle. Here, we analyze four large-scale datasets that capture the temporal and structural patterns of innovation abandonment across scientific, technological, commercial, and pharmacological domains. The paper makes three primary contributions. First, across these diverse domains, we uncover one simple pattern of preferential abandonment, whereby the probability for individuals or organizations to abandon an innovation increases with time and correlates with the number of network neighbors who have abandoned the innovation. Second, we find that the presence of preferential abandonment fundamentally alters the way in which the underlying ecosystem breaks down, inducing a novel structural collapse in networked systems commonly perceived as robust against abandonments. Third, we derive an analytical framework to systematically understand the impact of preferential abandonment on network dynamics, pinpointing specific conditions where it may accelerate, decelerate, or have an identical effect compared to random abandonment, depending on the network topology. Together, these results deepen our quantitative understanding of the abandonment of innovation within networked social systems, with implications for the robustness and functioning of innovation communities. Overall, they demonstrate that the dynamics of innovation abandonment follow simple yet reproducible patterns, suggesting that the uncovered preferential abandonment may be a generic property of the innovation lifecycle.

physics.soc-ph

When higher-order interactions matter: reducibility, parsimony, and microscopic organization

The current debate on higher-order interactions raises a fundamental question: when can systems organized through group interactions be faithfully represented within a graph-based formalism? Recent results show that graph descriptions can reproduce higher-order dynamics exactly or preserve selected macroscopic observables. Yet reducibility does not necessarily imply simplification, as information removed from the interaction structure may reappear as complexity in the effective dynamics, while structural features such as nestedness, heterogeneity, and cross-order correlations may be obscured by the reduction. We argue that formal representability alone is insufficient as a criterion for model choice. Both "simpler" and "equivalent" are question-dependent notions: parsimony must be assessed for the complete structure-dynamics model, and adequacy must be defined relative to the observables, scales, and regimes required by the scientific question. A reduced model may therefore be fully adequate for locating a phase transition or identifying a universality class while being inadequate for reproducing microscopic trajectories, transient dynamics, or structure-function relations. When group structure carries relevant microscopic information, higher-order representations may remain the most direct, interpretable, and parsimonious description, as well as the natural framework for understanding how microscopic organization gives rise to macroscopic behavior and functionality.

physics.soc-ph

Emotions as intrinsic colored noise in biological systems

The idea that emotions in biological systems are analogous to intrinsic colored noise is advanced and justified. A model describing the dynamics of operation of biological networks under the influence of colored noise is suggested. The agents of a biological network can be represented either by biological species, such as humans and animals, or by neurons of the brain, or by the nodes of a neural network. Operational actions, or decisions, in a biological noisy network are based not only on the evaluation of utility of alternatives, but also on the agents emotions. The model is probabilistic, with the choice of alternatives characterized by the related probabilities. At the initial step, the agents make decisions individually and then start exchanging information with each other and imitating the actions of other agents, thus forming a biological network of interacting agents. Numerical simulations are accomplished for a heterogeneous society consisting of three groups of agents, one group possessing long-range memory, the other group, short-range memory, and the third group of super-rational agents acting strictly on the basis of utility, being deprived of emotions. Dynamics of opinions in different groups can be smooth, oscillatory, or chaotic. Altogether, eight types of operation are found, depending on the dynamics of group decisions. Under strong imitation effect, there appears chaotic motion in the evolution of decision choice. It is shown how the Ellsberg paradox can be resolved and how the exchange of information influences the dynamics of this paradox.

physics.soc-ph