Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.31334

Formalizing Carleson's Theorem in Lean

Abstract

We present the formalization of Carleson's theorem in the proof assistant Lean. This paper describes the mathematical content, organization of the project, the blueprint, and the main design decisions behind the formalization. It is the result of a large collaborative effort, written and developed in public.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lars Becker, María Inés de Frutos-Fernández, Leo Diedering, Floris van Doorn, Sébastien Gouëzel, Evgenia Karunus, Edward van de Meent, Pietro Monticone, Jasper Mulder-Sohn, Jim Portegies, Joris Roos, Michael Rothgang, James Sundstrom, Jeremy Tan. 2026-09-25. Formalizing Carleson's Theorem in Lean. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31334

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Gabor frames with no Gabor duals

Let $H$ be an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space and let $\set{x_n}\inN$ be a frame for $H$. We say that a sequence $\set{y_n}\inN$ is an \emph{alternative dual} of $\set{x_n}\inN$ if $$x=\sumli\ip{x}{y_n}x_n\quad \text{for all }x\in H,$$ with the convergence of the series in the norm of $H.$ We say that a sequence $\set{z_n}\inN$ is a \emph{pseudo-synthesis dual} of $\set{x_n}\inN$ if $$x=\sumli\ip{x}{x_n}z_n \quad \text{for all }x\in H,$$ with the convergence of the series in the norm of $H.$ We prove that, at every level of smoothness of the generator, there exist Gabor frames for $L^2(\R^d)$ with infinitely many alternative duals (and pseudo-synthesis duals) such that none of them is a Gabor system

math.CA↗

Endpoint Absolute Monotonicity for the Complete Elliptic Integral of the First Kind

Let \begin{equation*} f_p(x)=\frac{\mathcal{K}(\sqrt{x})}{p-\ln\sqrt{1-x}}, \end{equation*} where $\mathcal{K}$ denotes the complete elliptic integral of the first kind, and set $g_p=1/f_p$. Tian and Yang conjectured that, at $p=\ln4$, both $-f_{\ln4}^{\prime\prime\prime}$ and $g_{\ln4}$ are absolutely monotonic on $(0,1)$. Writing \begin{equation*} \frac{2}πf_{\ln4}(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n(\ln4)x^n,\quad \fracπ{2}g_{\ln4}(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}b_n(\ln4)x^n, \end{equation*} we prove \begin{equation*} a_n(\ln4)<0\quad(n\geq3),\quad b_n(\ln4)>0\quad(n\geq0), \end{equation*} thereby settling both conjectures. The proof of the first inequality is based on the representation \begin{equation*} a_n(\ln4)=\frac{(-1)^nC}{15^{n+1}}-M_n, \end{equation*} where $C>0$ and $(M_n)$ is a positive moment sequence. Its strict log-convexity, together with estimates for the initial coefficients, determines the sign of every $a_n$. The second inequality follows from a factorization of the quadratic truncation of the normalized Taylor series and a reciprocal-series argument.

math.CA↗