Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.31081

Cosmological Inference with Gravitational-Wave Dark Sirens and 21-cm Intensity Mapping: Forecasts for LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA with MeerKAT and SKAO

Abstract

Gravitational waves (GWs) and 21-cm intensity mapping (IM) are emerging as complementary cosmological probes: GWs provide direct luminosity-distance measurements, while neutral-hydrogen (HI) IM traces the matter distribution in redshift space. Their synergy offers a promising avenue for precise measurements of the Hubble constant. Within a standard-siren framework, we perform a joint cosmological and population analysis using $\mathcal{O}(150)$ mock GW detections with SNR > 12, as projected for one year of observations at LVK O5 sensitivity. We combine these with mock HI intensity maps from MeerKLASS and SKA-Mid, and study how observational limitations in both the GW and IM data affect the $H_0$ constraints. We find that uncertainty in GW parameter measurements is a dominant limitation on the cosmological constraints. Neglecting this uncertainty, the inclusion of HI information enables sub-percent constraints on $H_0$. We also find that observational effects in the HI surveys weaken the constraints, although they remain tighter than those obtained without HI information (spectral sirens). Despite accounting for HI IM observational limitations, including HI information reduces the $H_0$ uncertainty relative to the spectral-siren results by 61% for MeerKLASS and 53% for SKA-Mid. Because our results are based on a single realisation, they should be interpreted in light of possible realisation-to-realisation variability. Beam convolution most severely weakens the constraints. Instrumental noise can induce multimodality in the posterior, potentially biasing the inferred parameters. The results are sensitive to foreground under-cleaning and over-cleaning. Partial sky coverage has a relatively small impact. In the most realistic scenario, which accounts for both GW and HI IM limitations, we obtain $H_0$ precision estimates of 10% and 15% for MeerKLASS and SKA-Mid, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dounia Nanadoumgar-Lacroze, Konstantin Leyde, Steven Cunnington, Tessa Baker, Ian Harrison, Ulyana Dupletsa, Simone Mastrogiovanni, Riccardo Murgia, Tommaso Ronconi, Matteo Schulz, Marta Spinelli. 2026-10-22. Cosmological Inference with Gravitational-Wave Dark Sirens and 21-cm Intensity Mapping: Forecasts for LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA with MeerKAT and SKAO. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31081

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Vacuum Polarization, Geodesic Equation and Sachs-Wolfe Effect

We show that the null geodesic equation for photons is modified in the presence of a charged scalar field, with quantum fluctuations acting as an effective mass term that changes the null paths to timelike curves. This effect can be interpreted as a vacuum polarization phenomenon in curved spacetime. The resulting contribution to the Sachs-Wolfe effect varies with photon frequency, leading to frequency-dependent corrections to the cosmic microwave background (CMB) blackbody spectrum in the form of a $μ$-distortion, as well as modifications to the CMB power spectrum. We estimate these within a standard inflationary scenario and find that while the correction to the CMB power spectrum is significant when the scalar field is light, the magnitude of the $μ$-distortion depends strongly on the regularization prescription.

astro-ph.CO↗

Testing Bump in the Cosmological Power Spectrum Using Dwarf Galaxies

We analyze the possibility of using observational data on nearby dwarf galaxies -- their luminosity functions and spatial distributions -- to constrain deviations of the cosmological power spectrum from the standard one. Specifically, we consider a cosmological model with a "bump" in the power spectrum at a wavelength of 1.3~Mpc and a dimensionless amplitude $\mathcal{A}=2.0$. Such a spectrum is motivated by observations of an excess number of galaxies at high redshifts. The bump leads to a noticeable increase in the luminosity function in the range $-13 > M_B > -17$ at $z=0$. Comparison with observations constrains the bump amplitude to $\mathcal{A} < 0.25$ at a 3-sigma significance level for a wavelength of 1.3~Mpc. For wavelengths smaller than 0.8~Mpc, the bump manifests only in the luminosity function of dwarfs with $M_B > -14$.

astro-ph.CO↗

Multi-tracers, multi-surveys: a joint Fisher analysis of DESI+PFS

Marginalizing over 11 effective-field-theory (EFT) nuisance parameters per tracer per redshift bin degrades cosmological precision in one-loop analyses of galaxy power-spectrum multipoles in redshift space. Simulation-based priors (SBP) tighten these parameters but rely on N-body simulations and halo-occupation-distribution (HOD) models. We consider a multi-tracer Fisher analysis as a complementary approach: auto- and cross-power spectra jointly constrain cosmology, galaxy bias and stochasticity through two channels -- within a survey and across overlapping surveys -- combined in a volume-partitioned joint Fisher analysis. We forecast across the $14{,}000\;\mathrm{deg}^2$ Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) footprint, including the $\sim\!1{,}200\;\mathrm{deg}^2$ Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) overlap at $z\in[0.6,1.6]$ with up to 4 tracers (PFS-ELG, DESI-ELG, DESI-LRG, DESI-QSO). We vary a common $\ln(10^{10}A_s)$, $M_ν$ and $Ω_m$, holding $h$, $ω_b$ and $n_s$ fixed. Adding internal-DESI cross-spectra to DESI auto-spectra reduces the errors on the derived $fσ_8(z=1.1)$, $M_ν$ and $Ω_m$ by 7.1%, 3.5% and 3.8%, respectively, at $k_{\rm max}=0.20\,h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$. Adding PFS auto- and cross-spectra to this complete DESI multi-tracer analysis further tightens these errors by 3.8%, 2.6% and 3.2%, respectively, after marginalizing over residual cross-population stochasticity. The clustering likelihood alone constrains the linear and quadratic biases and the shot noise. For these parameters it provides a complementary test of inference using SBP, while the counterterms remain weakly constrained. The framework extends to any number of overlapping spectroscopic surveys.

astro-ph.CO↗