Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.01864

Quantizing Recurrent Language Models Is Easier Than You Think

Abstract

Linear recurrences are becoming an increasingly common building block in large language models, replacing the growing KV cache of softmax attention with a fixed-size recurrent state that enables efficient decoding. However, the quantization stack has largely been developed around softmax Transformers, whose numerical properties and inference state differ from those of recurrent models. Our goal is to understand these differences and study the design space of quantization methods for recurrent models. In our analysis, we differentiate between two targets. First, extra-state quantization concerns weights and activations outside the recurrent state, whose distributions are shaped indirectly by the sequence mixer during training. In controlled 1.3B parameter models, we find that decayed recurrences develop weaker residual outlier channels than softmax attention and are therefore easier to quantize without incoherence processing. Second, intra-state quantization concerns the recurrent state itself during decode, where repeated updates create a different numerical problem from KV cache quantization. We instantiate our findings as LoReS, a state quantization pipeline combining value-axis scale grouping to match output channel magnitude, decay-based mixed-precision to protect slowly decaying heads or channels, and stochastic rounding to limit error accumulation under repeated requantization. Across Qwen-3.5 9B, Nemotron-H 8B, and Kimi-Linear 48B-A3B, LoReS supports robust 8-bit state quantization and lower effective precision on shorter decode horizons. We implement LoReS in vLLM and demonstrate end-to-end decode speedups.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Philipp Nazari, Neehal Tumma, Daniela Rus, T. Konstantin Rusch. 2026-11-01. Quantizing Recurrent Language Models Is Easier Than You Think. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01864

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Subspace Node Pruning

Node pruning is the art of removing computational units such as neurons, filters, attention heads, or even entire layers to significantly reduce inference time while retaining network performance. In this work, we show that a broad family of importance measures, from activation-based to Fisher-based, share a common quadratic form. Through a lower-triangular change of basis, this form yields a pruning subspace in which entire nodes can be removed while the impact of the lost units is simultaneously recovered via linear least squares. Furthermore, the importance measures within our subspace are decoupled and additive through an orthogonalization of the layer activations, allowing multi-node pruning within layers without interference between importance scores. Our method, Subspace Node Pruning (SNP), outperforms the compared baselines on VGG-16 and ResNet-50 on ImageNet. On OPT-125M and LLaMA-2 7B, SNP matches the state-of-the-art LLM Surgeon at a 40-shot schedule and outperforms it whenever fewer shots are used, all without any retraining after pruning.

cs.LG↗

On the growth of the parameters of approximating ReLU neural networks

This work focuses on the analysis of fully connected feed forward ReLU neural networks as they approximate a given, smooth function. In contrast to conventionally studied universal approximation properties under increasing architectures, e.g., in terms of width or depth of the networks, we are concerned with the asymptotic growth of the parameters of approximating networks. Such results are of interest, e.g., for error analysis or consistency results for neural network training. The main result of our work is that, for a ReLU architecture with state of the art approximation error, the realizing parameters grow at most polynomially. The obtained rate with respect to a normalized network size is compared to existing results and is shown to be superior in most cases, in particular for high dimensional input.

cs.LG↗

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

Natural gradient descent, and the preconditioned optimizers which have followed from it, correct gradient descent by estimating curvature and applying its inverse to the gradient. For any single layer of a deep neural network, this correction can be shown to approximately separate into two factors: one which accounts for correlations in the gradient signal, and one which accounts for correlations in the data arriving at that layer. Herein we show that this second factor can be expressed as a change of basis rather than of curvature and, considered thus, it can be removed from the optimizer entirely and placed within the network itself. Specifically, we show that, once forward weights are corrected, right-sided natural gradient descent can be implemented in a form which has three exactly equivalent forms: a gradient preconditioner, a decorrelating linear transform in the forward pass, or a set of recurrent dynamics in which all updates are Hebbian and rely only upon locally available signals. The (recurrent) decorrelation method we discover aligns closely with proposed methods for inhibitory learning and homeostatic plasticity in the brain. Notably, our transform requires no matrix inverse, no matrix decomposition, and no information beyond that which is available at an individual synapse. It can therefore be applied in distributed and physically constrained systems, including neuromorphic hardware and nervous systems, where existing preconditioners cannot. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically in convolutional and residual network models while significantly improving a range of approximate biologically plausible methods for credit assignment.

cs.LG↗