Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.09256

Zero-Query Transferable Pretend Benign Attacks with Amortized Online Generation for Cooperative Perception

Abstract

Cooperative perception enables an ego agent to acquire information from collaborators beyond its own sensors' reach. Yet, the most beneficial messages are often the hardest to verify from local observations. Pretend Benign (PB) exploits this asymmetry by targeting regions with weak local verifiability and applying multi-objective perturbations, making harmful feature changes appear to be benign assistance. However, PB is victim-dependent: selecting regions and optimizing perturbations require the victim model's architecture, parameters, and gradients, limiting transfer to unseen victims. A transferable attack must capture properties shared across cooperative detection models rather than those specific to one network. We address this by building a victim-agnostic attack from a heterogeneous ensemble of surrogate models and encoding its capabilities in a reusable dictionary to reduce per-message generation cost. Specifically, Transferable Pretend Benign (TrPB) transfers PB's region selection criterion and multi-objective perturbation strategy across heterogeneous surrogates to construct an offline attack. We further propose RT-TrPB, which encodes transferable regions and perturbation patterns into a region predictor and reusable perturbation dictionary, amortizing per-message attack generation. Experiments on widely used cooperative perception benchmarks show that RT-TrPB bypasses the consensus-based defenses ROBOSAC and FLD with success rates approaching 100% and generates each perturbation in under 56 ms. To counter PB-style attacks masquerading as benign collaboration, we also propose STTrust, which verifies received messages using spatial and temporal consistency and incorporates identity-level trust. STTrust detects over 90% of PB-style attacks and restores perception performance to near the attack-free level.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hongwei Lin, Xun Huang, Chenglu Wen, Cheng Wang. 2026-11-06. Zero-Query Transferable Pretend Benign Attacks with Amortized Online Generation for Cooperative Perception. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09256

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Limit Analysis for Symbolic Multi-step Reasoning Tasks with Information Propagation Rules Based on Transformers

Transformers are able to perform reasoning tasks, however the intrinsic mechanism remains widely open. In this paper we propose a set of information propagation rules based on Transformers and utilize symbolic reasoning tasks to theoretically analyze the limit reasoning steps. We show that the limit number of reasoning steps is between $2^{L-1}-1$ and $\frac{3^{L-1}-1}{2}$ for a model with $L$ attention layers in a single-pass. In addition, we find that, for problems with a fixed number of reasoning steps, Transformers exhibit a preference for generating sequences that satisfy certain ordering relations. Ultimately, we construct a Transformer and prove that the limiting reasoning depth is achievable.

cs.AI↗

Counterfactual Distillation: Internalizing Reflective Experience into LLM Agent

Large language models increasingly act as autonomous agents in long-horizon interactions, learning from final outcomes and environmental feedback. However, optimizing from such interaction experience remains challenging, as feedback is heterogeneous and rarely carries explicit reward information. Existing post-training approaches rely on outcome-driven methods, such as reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), which primarily exploit final success signals while leaving interaction experience and feedback underutilized. In sparse-reward, long-horizon tasks, this often results in distribution sharpening: the policy reinforces a narrow set of already-successful behaviors, without substantially improving the feedback-grounded agency needed for broader problem-solving capacity (e.g., Pass@k). We propose Counterfactual Distillation, a framework that converts exploration-derived experience into trainable policy supervision. Specifically, we organize exploration as a tree-structured search process, where the agent reflects on past decision points and makes new experience-guided decisions to form alternative branches. These corrections are then distilled as counterfactual targets: we train the model to predict the revised action from the original history without explicitly providing the experience, thereby introducing out-of-distribution behavior patterns and expanding exploration capacity. Across diverse interactive coding and agentic tasks, our method outperforms outcome-driven baselines such as GRPO and experience-based methods such as Early Experience, with gains of up to 14 percentage points over the base model on Pass@128. When interleaved with reinforcement learning updates, it further raises the performance ceiling, improving Pass@1 on Sokoban by 8 percentage points over extended GRPO. Our code is available at https://github.com/motigrez/Counterfactual-Distillation.

cs.AI↗

Taming the Centaur(s) with LAPITHS: a framework for a theoretically grounded interpretation of AI performances

We introduce a framework called LAPITHS (Language model Analysis through Paradigm grounded Interpretations of Theses about Human likenesS) and use it to show that several major claims advanced by models such as CENTAUR, proposed as an artificial Unified Model of Cognition, are not theoretically or empirically justified. LAPITHS provides a principled reference point for counteracting the current behaviouristic tendency in AI research to interpret the human level performances of transformer based language models as evidence of human like underlying computation and, by extension, as signs of cognitive abilities. The novelty of LAPITHS lies in making explicit the arguments grounded in two quantitative assessments: (i) the Minimal Cognitive Grid, a theoretically motivated method for estimating the cognitive plausibility of artificial systems, and (ii) a behavioural comparison showing that results similar to those reported for CENTAUR like models can be reproduced by other systems that do not satisfy the structural constraints typically associated with cognitive plausibility, and whose outputs do not provide independent explanatory insight into human cognition.

cs.AI↗