arXiv · cs/0410061
An argumentative annotation schema for meeting discussions
Abstract
In this article, we are interested in the annotation of transcriptions of human-human dialogue taken from meeting records. We first propose a meeting content model where conversational acts are interpreted with respect to their argumentative force and their role in building the argumentative structure of the meeting discussion. Argumentation in dialogue describes the way participants take part in the discussion and argue their standpoints. Then, we propose an annotation scheme based on such an argumentative dialogue model as well as the evaluation of its adequacy. The obtained higher-level semantic annotations are exploited in the conceptual indexing of the information contained in meeting discussions.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Vincenzo Pallotta, Hatem Ghorbel, Patrick Ruch, Giovanni Coray. 2004-10-25. An argumentative annotation schema for meeting discussions. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0410061
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.