Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Josh Alman

Publications and source records attributed to Josh Alman.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Faster Algorithms for Average-Case Orthogonal Vectors and Closest Pair Problems

We study the average-case version of the Orthogonal Vectors problem, in which one is given as input $n$ vectors from $\{0,1\}^d$ which are chosen randomly so that each coordinate is $1$ independently with probability $p$. Kane and Williams [ITCS 2019] showed how to solve this problem in time $O(n^{2 - δ_p})$ for a constant $δ_p > 0$ that depends only on $p$. However, it was previously unclear how to solve the problem faster in the hardest parameter regime where $p$ may depend on $d$. The best prior algorithm was the best worst-case algorithm by Abboud, Williams and Yu [SODA 2014], which in dimension $d = c \cdot \log n$, solves the problem in time $n^{2 - Ω(1/\log c)}$. In this paper, we give a new algorithm which improves this to $n^{2 - Ω(\log\log c /\log c)}$ in the average case for any parameter $p$. As in the prior work, our algorithm uses the polynomial method. We make use of a very simple polynomial over the reals, and use a new method to analyze its performance based on computing how its value degrades as the input vectors get farther from orthogonal. To demonstrate the generality of our approach, we also solve the average-case version of the closest pair problem in the same running time.

cs.DS↗

Improving the Leading Constant of Matrix Multiplication

Algebraic matrix multiplication algorithms are designed by bounding the rank of matrix multiplication tensors, and then using a recursive method. However, designing algorithms in this way quickly leads to large constant factors: if one proves that the tensor for multiplying $n \times n$ matrices has rank $\leq t$, then the resulting recurrence shows that $M \times M$ matrices can be multiplied using $O(n^2 \cdot M^{\log_n t})$ operations, where the leading constant scales proportionally to $n^2$. Even modest increases in $n$ can blow up the leading constant too much to be worth the slight decrease in the exponent of $M$. Meanwhile, the asymptotically best algorithms use very large $n$, such that $n^2$ is larger than the number of atoms in the visible universe! In this paper, we give new ways to use tensor rank bounds to design matrix multiplication algorithms, which lead to smaller leading constants than the standard recursive method. Our main result shows that, if the tensor for multiplying $n \times n$ matrices has rank $\leq t$, then $M \times M$ matrices can be multiplied using only $n^{O(1/(\log n)^{0.33})} \cdot M^{\log_n t}$ operations. In other words, we improve the leading constant in general from $O(n^2)$ to $n^{O(1/(\log n)^{0.33})} < n^{o(1)}$. We then apply this and further improve the leading constant in a number of situations of interest. We show that, in the popularly-conjectured case where $ω=2$, a new, different recursive approach can lead to an improvement. We also show that the leading constant of the current asymptotically fastest matrix multiplication algorithm, and any algorithm designed using the group-theoretic method, can be further improved by taking advantage of additional structure of the underlying tensor identities.

cs.CC↗

A Refined Laser Method and Faster Matrix Multiplication

The complexity of matrix multiplication is measured in terms of $ω$, the smallest real number such that two $n\times n$ matrices can be multiplied using $O(n^{ω+ε})$ field operations for all $ε>0$; the best bound until now is $ω<2.37287$ [Le Gall'14]. All bounds on $ω$ since 1986 have been obtained using the so-called laser method, a way to lower-bound the `value' of a tensor in designing matrix multiplication algorithms. The main result of this paper is a refinement of the laser method that improves the resulting value bound for most sufficiently large tensors. Thus, even before computing any specific values, it is clear that we achieve an improved bound on $ω$, and we indeed obtain the best bound on $ω$ to date: $$ω< 2.37286.$$ The improvement is of the same magnitude as the improvement that [Le Gall'14] obtained over the previous bound [Vassilevska W.'12]. Our improvement to the laser method is quite general, and we believe it will have further applications in arithmetic complexity.

cs.DS↗

Finer-Grained Hardness of Kernel Density Estimation

In batch Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) for a kernel function $f$, we are given as input $2n$ points $x^{(1)}, \cdots, x^{(n)}, y^{(1)}, \cdots, y^{(n)}$ in dimension $m$, as well as a vector $v \in \mathbb{R}^n$. These inputs implicitly define the $n \times n$ kernel matrix $K$ given by $K[i,j] = f(x^{(i)}, y^{(j)})$. The goal is to compute a vector $v$ which approximates $K w$ with $|| Kw - v||_\infty < \varepsilon ||w||_1$. A recent line of work has proved fine-grained lower bounds conditioned on SETH. Backurs et al. first showed the hardness of KDE for Gaussian-like kernels with high dimension $m = Ω(\log n)$ and large scale $B = Ω(\log n)$. Alman et al. later developed new reductions in roughly this same parameter regime, leading to lower bounds for more general kernels, but only for very small error $\varepsilon < 2^{- \log^{Ω(1)} (n)}$. In this paper, we refine the approach of Alman et al. to show new lower bounds in all parameter regimes, closing gaps between the known algorithms and lower bounds. In the setting where $m = C\log n$ and $B = o(\log n)$, we prove Gaussian KDE requires $n^{2-o(1)}$ time to achieve additive error $\varepsilon < Ω(m/B)^{-m}$, matching the performance of the polynomial method up to low-order terms. In the low dimensional setting $m = o(\log n)$, we show that Gaussian KDE requires $n^{2-o(1)}$ time to achieve $\varepsilon$ such that $\log \log (\varepsilon^{-1}) > \tilde Ω((\log n)/m)$, matching the error bound achievable by FMM up to low-order terms. To our knowledge, no nontrivial lower bound was previously known in this regime. Our new lower bounds make use of an intricate analysis of a special case of the kernel matrix -- the `counting matrix'. As a key technical lemma, we give a novel approach to bounding the entries of its inverse by using Schur polynomials from algebraic combinatorics.

cs.DS↗

The Fine-Grained Complexity of Gradient Computation for Training Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) have made fundamental contributions over the last a few years. To train an LLM, one needs to alternatingly run `forward' computations and `backward' computations. The forward computation can be viewed as attention function evaluation, and the backward computation can be viewed as a gradient computation. In previous work by [Alman and Song, NeurIPS 2023], it was proved that the forward step can be performed in almost-linear time in certain parameter regimes, but that there is no truly sub-quadratic time algorithm in the remaining parameter regimes unless the popular hypothesis SETH is false. In this work, we show nearly identical results for the harder-seeming problem of computing the gradient of loss function of one layer attention network, and thus for the entire process of LLM training. This completely characterizes the fine-grained complexity of every step of LLM training.

cs.LG↗

Tensor Ranks and the Fine-Grained Complexity of Dynamic Programming

Generalizing work of Künnemann, Paturi, and Schneider [ICALP 2017], we study a wide class of high-dimensional dynamic programming (DP) problems in which one must find the shortest path between two points in a high-dimensional grid given a tensor of transition costs between nodes in the grid. This captures many classical problems which are solved using DP such as the knapsack problem, the airplane refueling problem, and the minimal-weight polygon triangulation problem. We observe that for many of these problems, the tensor naturally has low tensor rank or low slice rank. We then give new algorithms and a web of fine-grained reductions to tightly determine the complexity of these problems. For instance, we show that a polynomial speedup over the DP algorithm is possible when the tensor rank is a constant or the slice rank is 1, but that such a speedup is impossible if the tensor rank is slightly super-constant (assuming SETH) or the slice rank is at least 3 (assuming the APSP conjecture). We find that this characterizes the known complexities for many of these problems, and in some cases leads to new faster algorithms.

cs.CC↗

Generalizations of Matrix Multiplication can solve the Light Bulb Problem

In the light bulb problem, one is given uniformly random vectors $x_1, \ldots, x_n, y_1, \ldots, y_n \in \{-1,1\}^d$. They are all chosen independently except a planted pair $(x_{i^*}, y_{j^*})$ is chosen with correlation $ρ>0$. The goal is to find the planted pair. This problem was introduced over 30 years ago by L.~Valiant, and is known to have many applications in data analysis, statistics, and learning theory. The naive algorithm runs in $Ω(n^2)$ time, and algorithms based on Locality-Sensitive Hashing approach quadratic time as $ρ\to 0$. In 2012, G.~Valiant gave a breakthrough algorithm using fast matrix multiplication that runs in time $O(n^{(5-ω)/(4-ω)}) < O(n^{1.615})$, no matter how small $ρ>0$ is. This was subsequently refined by Karppa, Kaski, and Kohonen in 2016 to $O(n^{2 ω/ 3}) < O(n^{1.582})$. In this paper, we propose a new approach which can replace matrix multiplication tensor with other tensors. Those tensors can omit some terms one is supposed to compute, and include additional error terms. Our new approach can make use of any tensors which previously had no known algorithmic applications, including tensors which arise naturally as intermediate steps in border rank methods and in the Laser method. We further show that our approach can be combined with locality-sensitive hashing to design an algorithm whose running time improves as $ρ$ gets larger. To our knowledge, this is the first algorithm which combines fast matrix multiplication with hashing for the light bulb problem or any closest pair problem, and it leads to faster algorithms for small $ρ>0$. We also introduce a new tensor $T_{2112}$, which has the same size of $2 \times 2$ matrix multiplication tensor, but runs faster than the Strassen's algorithm for light bulb problem.

cs.DS↗

How to Capture Higher-order Correlations? Generalizing Matrix Softmax Attention to Kronecker Computation

In the classical transformer attention scheme, we are given three $n \times d$ size matrices $Q, K, V$ (the query, key, and value tokens), and the goal is to compute a new $n \times d$ size matrix $D^{-1} \exp(QK^\top) V$ where $D = \mathrm{diag}( \exp(QK^\top) {\bf 1}_n )$. In this work, we study a generalization of attention which captures triple-wise correlations. This generalization is able to solve problems about detecting triple-wise connections that were shown to be impossible for transformers. The potential downside of this generalization is that it appears as though computations are even more difficult, since the straightforward algorithm requires cubic time in $n$. However, we show that in the bounded-entry setting (which arises in practice, and which is well-studied in both theory and practice), there is actually a near-linear time algorithm. More precisely, we show that bounded entries are both necessary and sufficient for quickly performing generalized computations: $\bullet$ On the positive side, if all entries of the input matrices are bounded above by $o(\sqrt[3]{\log n})$ then we show how to approximate the ``tensor-type'' attention matrix in $n^{1+o(1)}$ time. $\bullet$ On the negative side, we show that if the entries of the input matrices may be as large as $Ω(\sqrt[3]{\log n})$, then there is no algorithm that runs faster than $n^{3-o(1)}$ (assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis from fine-grained complexity theory). We also show that our construction, algorithms, and lower bounds naturally generalize to higher-order tensors and correlations. Interestingly, the higher the order of the tensors, the lower the bound on the entries needs to be for an efficient algorithm. Our results thus yield a natural tradeoff between the boundedness of the entries, and order of the tensor one may use for more expressive, efficient attention computation.

cs.DS↗

Faster Walsh-Hadamard and Discrete Fourier Transforms From Matrix Non-Rigidity

We give algorithms with lower arithmetic operation counts for both the Walsh-Hadamard Transform (WHT) and the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) on inputs of power-of-2 size $N$. For the WHT, our new algorithm has an operation count of $\frac{23}{24}N \log N + O(N)$. To our knowledge, this gives the first improvement on the $N \log N$ operation count of the simple, folklore Fast Walsh-Hadamard Transform algorithm. For the DFT, our new FFT algorithm uses $\frac{15}{4}N \log N + O(N)$ real arithmetic operations. Our leading constant $\frac{15}{4} = 3.75$ improves on the leading constant of $5$ from the Cooley-Tukey algorithm from 1965, leading constant $4$ from the split-radix algorithm of Yavne from 1968, leading constant $\frac{34}{9}=3.777\ldots$ from a modification of the split-radix algorithm by Van Buskirk from 2004, and leading constant $3.76875$ from a theoretically optimized version of Van Buskirk's algorithm by Sergeev from 2017. Our new WHT algorithm takes advantage of a recent line of work on the non-rigidity of the WHT: we decompose the WHT matrix as the sum of a low-rank matrix and a sparse matrix, and then analyze the structures of these matrices to achieve a lower operation count. Our new DFT algorithm comes from a novel reduction, showing that parts of the previous best FFT algorithms can be replaced by calls to an algorithm for the WHT. Replacing the folklore WHT algorithm with our new improved algorithm leads to our improved FFT.

cs.DS↗

Fast Attention Requires Bounded Entries

In modern machine learning, inner product attention computation is a fundamental task for training large language models such as Transformer, GPT-1, BERT, GPT-2, GPT-3 and ChatGPT. Formally, in this problem, one is given as input three matrices $Q, K, V \in [-B,B]^{n \times d}$, and the goal is to construct the matrix $\mathrm{Att}(Q,K,V) := \mathrm{diag}(A {\bf 1}_n)^{-1} A V \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$, where $A = \exp(QK^\top/d)$ is the `attention matrix', and $\exp$ is applied entry-wise. Straightforward methods for this problem explicitly compute the $n \times n$ attention matrix $A$, and hence require time $Ω(n^2)$ even when $d = n^{o(1)}$ is small. In this paper, we investigate whether faster algorithms are possible by implicitly making use of the matrix $A$. We present two results, showing that there is a sharp transition at $B = Θ(\sqrt{\log n})$. $\bullet$ If $d = O(\log n)$ and $B = o(\sqrt{\log n})$, there is an $n^{1+o(1)}$ time algorithm to approximate $\mathrm{Att}(Q,K,V)$ up to $1/\mathrm{poly}(n)$ additive error. $\bullet$ If $d = O(\log n)$ and $B = Θ(\sqrt{\log n})$, assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis from fine-grained complexity theory, it is impossible to approximate $\mathrm{Att}(Q,K,V)$ up to $1/\mathrm{poly}(n)$ additive error in truly subquadratic time $n^{2 - Ω(1)}$. This gives a theoretical explanation for the phenomenon observed in practice that attention computation is much more efficient when the input matrices have smaller entries.

cs.LG↗

Matrix Multiplication and Number On the Forehead Communication

Three-player Number On the Forehead communication may be thought of as a three-player Number In the Hand promise model, in which each player is given the inputs that are supposedly on the other two players' heads, and promised that they are consistent with the inputs of of the other players. The set of all allowed inputs under this promise may be thought of as an order-3 tensor. We surprisingly observe that this tensor is exactly the matrix multiplication tensor, which is widely studied in the design of fast matrix multiplication algorithms. Using this connection, we prove a number of results about both Number On the Forehead communication and matrix multiplication, each by using known results or techniques about the other. For example, we show how the Laser method, a key technique used to design the best matrix multiplication algorithms, can also be used to design communication protocols for a variety of problems. We also show how known lower bounds for Number On the Forehead communication can be used to bound properties of the matrix multiplication tensor such as its zeroing out subrank. Finally, we substantially generalize known methods based on slice-rank for studying communication, and show how they directly relate to the matrix multiplication exponent $ω$.

cs.CC↗

Bypass Exponential Time Preprocessing: Fast Neural Network Training via Weight-Data Correlation Preprocessing

Over the last decade, deep neural networks have transformed our society, and they are already widely applied in various machine learning applications. State-of-art deep neural networks are becoming larger in size every year to deliver increasing model accuracy, and as a result, model training consumes substantial computing resources and will only consume more in the future. Using current training methods, in each iteration, to process a data point $x \in \mathbb{R}^d$ in a layer, we need to spend $Θ(md)$ time to evaluate all the $m$ neurons in the layer. This means processing the entire layer takes $Θ(nmd)$ time for $n$ data points. Recent work [Song, Yang and Zhang, NeurIPS 2021] reduces this time per iteration to $o(nmd)$, but requires exponential time to preprocess either the data or the neural network weights, making it unlikely to have practical usage. In this work, we present a new preprocessing method that simply stores the weight-data correlation in a tree data structure in order to quickly, dynamically detect which neurons fire at each iteration. Our method requires only $O(nmd)$ time in preprocessing and still achieves $o(nmd)$ time per iteration. We complement our new algorithm with a lower bound, proving that assuming a popular conjecture from complexity theory, one could not substantially speed up our algorithm for dynamic detection of firing neurons.

cs.LG↗

Faster Walsh-Hadamard Transform and Matrix Multiplication over Finite Fields using Lookup Tables

We use lookup tables to design faster algorithms for important algebraic problems over finite fields. These faster algorithms, which only use arithmetic operations and lookup table operations, may help to explain the difficulty of determining the complexities of these important problems. Our results over a constant-sized finite field are as follows. The Walsh-Hadamard transform of a vector of length $N$ can be computed using $O(N \log N / \log \log N)$ bit operations. This generalizes to any transform defined as a Kronecker power of a fixed matrix. By comparison, the Fast Walsh-Hadamard transform (similar to the Fast Fourier transform) uses $O(N \log N)$ arithmetic operations, which is believed to be optimal up to constant factors. Any algebraic algorithm for multiplying two $N \times N$ matrices using $O(N^ω)$ operations can be converted into an algorithm using $O(N^ω/ (\log N)^{ω/2 - 1})$ bit operations. For example, Strassen's algorithm can be converted into an algorithm using $O(N^{2.81} / (\log N)^{0.4})$ bit operations. It remains an open problem with practical implications to determine the smallest constant $c$ such that Strassen's algorithm can be implemented to use $c \cdot N^{2.81} + o(N^{2.81})$ arithmetic operations; using a lookup table allows one to save a super-constant factor in bit operations.

cs.DS↗

Smaller Low-Depth Circuits for Kronecker Powers

We give new, smaller constructions of constant-depth linear circuits for computing any matrix which is the Kronecker power of a fixed matrix. A standard argument (e.g., the mixed product property of Kronecker products, or a generalization of the Fast Walsh-Hadamard transform) shows that any such $N \times N$ matrix has a depth-2 circuit of size $O(N^{1.5})$. We improve on this for all such matrices, and especially for some such matrices of particular interest: - For any integer $q > 1$ and any matrix which is the Kronecker power of a fixed $q \times q$ matrix, we construct a depth-2 circuit of size $O(N^{1.5 - a_q})$, where $a_q > 0$ is a positive constant depending only on $q$. No bound beating size $O(N^{1.5})$ was previously known for any $q>2$. - For the case $q=2$, i.e., for any matrix which is the Kronecker power of a fixed $2 \times 2$ matrix, we construct a depth-2 circuit of size $O(N^{1.446})$, improving the prior best size $O(N^{1.493})$ [Alman, 2021]. - For the Walsh-Hadamard transform, we construct a depth-2 circuit of size $O(N^{1.443})$, improving the prior best size $O(N^{1.476})$ [Alman, 2021]. - For the disjointness matrix (the communication matrix of set disjointness, or equivalently, the matrix for the linear transform that evaluates a multilinear polynomial on all $0/1$ inputs), we construct a depth-2 circuit of size $O(N^{1.258})$, improving the prior best size $O(N^{1.272})$ [Jukna and Sergeev, 2013]. Our constructions also generalize to improving the standard construction for any depth $\leq O(\log N)$. Our main technical tool is an improved way to convert a nontrivial circuit for any matrix into a circuit for its Kronecker powers. Our new bounds provably could not be achieved using the approaches of prior work.

cs.DS↗

Parameterized Sensitivity Oracles and Dynamic Algorithms using Exterior Algebras

We design the first efficient sensitivity oracles and dynamic algorithms for a variety of parameterized problems. Our main approach is to modify the algebraic coding technique from static parameterized algorithm design, which had not previously been used in a dynamic context. We particularly build off of the `extensor coding' method of Brand, Dell and Husfeldt [STOC'18], employing properties of the exterior algebra over different fields. For the $k$-Path detection problem for directed graphs, it is known that no efficient dynamic algorithm exists (under popular assumptions from fine-grained complexity). We circumvent this by designing an efficient sensitivity oracle, which preprocesses a directed graph on $n$ vertices in $2^k poly(k) n^{ω+o(1)}$ time, such that, given $\ell$ updates (mixing edge insertions and deletions, and vertex deletions) to that input graph, it can decide in time $\ell^2 2^kpoly(k)$ and with high probability, whether the updated graph contains a path of length $k$. We also give a deterministic sensitivity oracle requiring $4^k poly(k) n^{ω+o(1)}$ preprocessing time and $\ell^2 2^{ωk + o(k)}$ query time, and obtain a randomized sensitivity oracle for the task of approximately counting the number of $k$-paths. For $k$-Path detection in undirected graphs, we obtain a randomized sensitivity oracle with $O(1.66^k n^3)$ preprocessing time and $O(\ell^3 1.66^k)$ query time, and a better bound for undirected bipartite graphs. In addition, we present the first fully dynamic algorithms for a variety of problems: $k$-Partial Cover, $m$-Set $k$-Packing, $t$-Dominating Set, $d$-Dimensional $k$-Matching, and Exact $k$-Partial Cover. For example, for $k$-Partial Cover we show a randomized dynamic algorithm with $2^k poly(k)polylog(n)$ update time, and a deterministic dynamic algorithm with $4^kpoly(k)polylog(n)$ update time.

cs.DS↗

Optimal-Degree Polynomial Approximations for Exponentials and Gaussian Kernel Density Estimation

For any real numbers $B \ge 1$ and $δ\in (0, 1)$ and function $f: [0, B] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, let $d_{B; δ} (f) \in \mathbb{Z}_{> 0}$ denote the minimum degree of a polynomial $p(x)$ satisfying $\sup_{x \in [0, B]} \big| p(x) - f(x) \big| < δ$. In this paper, we provide precise asymptotics for $d_{B; δ} (e^{-x})$ and $d_{B; δ} (e^{x})$ in terms of both $B$ and $δ$, improving both the previously known upper bounds and lower bounds. In particular, we show $$d_{B; δ} (e^{-x}) = Θ\left( \max \left\{ \sqrt{B \log(δ^{-1})}, \frac{\log(δ^{-1}) }{ \log(B^{-1} \log(δ^{-1}))} \right\}\right), \text{ and}$$ $$d_{B; δ} (e^{x}) = Θ\left( \max \left\{ B, \frac{\log(δ^{-1}) }{ \log(B^{-1} \log(δ^{-1}))} \right\}\right).$$ Polynomial approximations for $e^{-x}$ and $e^x$ have applications to the design of algorithms for many problems, and our degree bounds show both the power and limitations of these algorithms. We focus in particular on the Batch Gaussian Kernel Density Estimation problem for $n$ sample points in $Θ(\log n)$ dimensions with error $δ= n^{-Θ(1)}$. We show that the running time one can achieve depends on the square of the diameter of the point set, $B$, with a transition at $B = Θ(\log n)$ mirroring the corresponding transition in $d_{B; δ} (e^{-x})$: - When $B=o(\log n)$, we give the first algorithm running in time $n^{1 + o(1)}$. - When $B = κ\log n$ for a small constant $κ>0$, we give an algorithm running in time $n^{1 + O(\log \log κ^{-1} /\log κ^{-1})}$. The $\log \log κ^{-1} /\log κ^{-1}$ term in the exponent comes from analyzing the behavior of the leading constant in our computation of $d_{B; δ} (e^{-x})$. - When $B = ω(\log n)$, we show that time $n^{2 - o(1)}$ is necessary assuming SETH.

cs.CC↗

Metric Transforms and Low Rank Matrices via Representation Theory of the Real Hyperrectangle

In this paper, we develop a new technique which we call representation theory of the real hyperrectangle, which describes how to compute the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of certain matrices arising from hyperrectangles. We show that these matrices arise naturally when analyzing a number of different algorithmic tasks such as kernel methods, neural network training, natural language processing, and the design of algorithms using the polynomial method. We then use our new technique along with these connections to prove several new structural results in these areas, including: $\bullet$ A function is a positive definite Manhattan kernel if and only if it is a completely monotone function. These kernels are widely used across machine learning; one example is the Laplace kernel which is widely used in machine learning for chemistry. $\bullet$ A function transforms Manhattan distances to Manhattan distances if and only if it is a Bernstein function. This completes the theory of Manhattan to Manhattan metric transforms initiated by Assouad in 1980. $\bullet$ A function applied entry-wise to any square matrix of rank $r$ always results in a matrix of rank $< 2^{r-1}$ if and only if it is a polynomial of sufficiently low degree. This gives a converse to a key lemma used by the polynomial method in algorithm design. Our work includes a sophisticated combination of techniques from different fields, including metric embeddings, the polynomial method, and group representation theory.

cs.CG↗

Kronecker Products, Low-Depth Circuits, and Matrix Rigidity

For a matrix $M$ and a positive integer $r$, the rank $r$ rigidity of $M$ is the smallest number of entries of $M$ which one must change to make its rank at most $r$. There are many known applications of rigidity lower bounds to a variety of areas in complexity theory, but fewer known applications of rigidity upper bounds. In this paper, we use rigidity upper bounds to prove new upper bounds in a few different models of computation. Our results include: $\bullet$ For any $d> 1$, and over any field $\mathbb{F}$, the $N \times N$ Walsh-Hadamard transform has a depth-$d$ linear circuit of size $O(d \cdot N^{1 + 0.96/d})$. This circumvents a known lower bound of $Ω(d \cdot N^{1 + 1/d})$ for circuits with bounded coefficients over $\mathbb{C}$ by Pudlák (2000), by using coefficients of magnitude polynomial in $N$. Our construction also generalizes to linear transformations given by a Kronecker power of any fixed $2 \times 2$ matrix. $\bullet$ The $N \times N$ Walsh-Hadamard transform has a linear circuit of size $\leq (1.81 + o(1)) N \log_2 N$, improving on the bound of $\approx 1.88 N \log_2 N$ which one obtains from the standard fast Walsh-Hadamard transform. $\bullet$ A new rigidity upper bound, showing that the following classes of matrices are not rigid enough to prove circuit lower bounds using Valiant's approach: $-$ for any field $\mathbb{F}$ and any function $f : \{0,1\}^n \to \mathbb{F}$, the matrix $V_f \in \mathbb{F}^{2^n \times 2^n}$ given by, for any $x,y \in \{0,1\}^n$, $V_f[x,y] = f(x \wedge y)$, and $-$ for any field $\mathbb{F}$ and any fixed-size matrices $M_1, \ldots, M_n \in \mathbb{F}^{q \times q}$, the Kronecker product $M_1 \otimes M_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes M_n$. This generalizes recent results on non-rigidity, using a simpler approach which avoids needing the polynomial method.

cs.DS↗