Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Vladimir S. Matveev

Publications and source records attributed to Vladimir S. Matveev.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Four-dimensional Kähler metrics admitting c-projective vector fields

A vector field on a Kähler manifold is called c-projective if its flow preserves the J-planar curves. We give a complete local classification of Kähler real 4-dimensional manifolds that admit an essential c-projective vector field. An important technical step is a local description of 4-dimensional c-projectively equivalent metrics of arbitrary signature. As an application of our results we prove the natural analog of the classical Yano-Obata conjecture in the pseudo-Riemannian 4-dimensional case.

math.DG↗

Conification construction for Kaehler manifolds and its application in c-projective geometry

Two Kaehler metrics on one complex manifold are said to be c-projectively equivalent if their J-planar curves, i.e., curves defined by the property that their acceleration is complex proportional to their velocity, coincide. The degree of mobility of a Kaehler metric is the dimension of the space of metrics that are c-projectively equivalent to it. We give the list of all possible values of the degree of mobility of simply connected 2n-dimensional Riemannian Kaehler manifolds. We also describe all such values under the additional assumption that the metric is Einstein. As an application, we describe all possible dimensions of the space of essential c-projective vector fields of Kaehler and Kaehler-Einstein Riemannian metrics. We also show that two c-projectively equivalent Kaehler Einstein metrics (of arbitrary signature) on a closed manifold have constant holomorphic curvature or are affinely equivalent.

math.DG↗

There exist no 4-dimensional geodesically equivalent metrics with the same stress-energy tensor

We show that if two 4-dimensional metrics of arbitrary signature on one manifold are geodesically equivalent (i.e., have the same geodesics considered as unparameterized curves) and are solutions of the Einstein field equation with the same stress-energy tensor, then they are affinely equivalent or flat. Under the additional assumption that the metrics are complete or the manifold is closed, the result survives in all dimensions >2.

math.DG↗

A criterion for compatibility of conformal and projective structures

In a space-time, a conformal structure is defined by the distribution of light-cones. Geodesics are traced by freely falling particles, and the collection of all unparameterized geodesics determines the projective structure of the space-time. The article contains a formulation of the necessary and sufficient conditions for these structures to be compatible, i.e. to come from a metric tensor which is then unique up to a constant factor. The theorem applies to all dimensions and signatures.

math.DG↗

Degree of mobility for metrics of lorentzian signature and parallel (0,2)-tensor fields on cone manifolds

Degree of mobility of a (pseudo-Riemannian) metric is the dimension of the space of metrics geodesically equivalent to it. We describe all possible values of the degree of mobility on a simply connected n-dimensional manifold of lorentz signature. As an application we calculate all possible differences between the dimension of the projective and the isometry groups. One of the main new technical results in the proof is the description of all parallel symmetric (0,2)-tensor fields on cone manifolds of signature $(n-1,2).

math.DG↗

The Binet-Legendre Metric in Finsler Geometry

For every Finsler metric $F$ we associate a Riemannian metric $g_F$ (called the Binet-Legendre metric). The transformation $F \mapsto g_F$ is $C^0$-stable and has good smoothness properties, in contrast to previous constructions. The Riemannian metric $g_F$ also behaves nicely under conformal or bilipshitz deformation of the Finsler metric $F$. These properties makes it a powerful tool in Finsler geometry and we illustrate that by solving a number of named Finslerian geometric problems. We also generalize and give new and shorter proofs of a number of known results. In particular we answer a question of M. Matsumoto about local conformal mapping between two Minkowski spaces, we describe all possible conformal self maps and all self similarities on a Finsler manifold. We also classify all compact conformally flat Finsler manifolds, solve a conjecture of S. Deng and Z. Hou on the Berwaldian character of locally symmetric Finsler spaces, and extend the classic result of H.C. Wang about the maximal dimension of the isometry groups of Finsler manifolds to manifolds of all dimensions. Most proofs in this paper go along the following scheme: using the correspondence $F \mapsto g_F$we reduce the Finslerian problem to a similar problem for the Binet-Legendre metric, which is easier and is already solved in most cases we consider. The solution of the Riemannian problem provides us with the additional information that helps to solve the initial Finslerian problem. Our methods apply even in the absence of the strong convexity assumption usually assumed in Finsler geometry. The smoothness hypothesis can also be replaced by that of partial smoothness, a notion we introduce in the paper. Our results apply therefore to a vast class of Finsler metrics not usually considered in the Finsler literature.

math.DG↗

On submaximal dimension of the group of almost isometries of Finsler metrics

We show that the second greatest possible dimension of the group of (local) almost isometries of a Finsler metric is $\frac{n^2 -n}{2} +1$ for $n= dim(M)\ne 4 $ and $\frac{n^2 -n}{2} +2 =8$ for $n=4$. If a Finsler metric has the group of almost isometries of dimension greater than $\frac{n^2 -n}{2} +1$, then the Finsler metric is Randers, i.e., $F(x,y)= \sqrt{g_x(y,y)} + τ(y)$. Moreover, if $n\ne 4$, the Riemannian metric $g$ has constant sectional curvature and, if in addition $n\ne 2$, the 1-form $τ$ is closed, so (locally) the metric admits the group of local isometries of the maximal dimension $\frac{n(n+1)}2$.

math.DG↗

Can we make a Finsler metric complete by a trivial projective change?

A trivial projective change of a Finsler metric $F$ is the Finsler metric $F + df$. I explain when it is possible to make a given Finsler metric both forward and backward complete by a trivial projective change. The problem actually came from lorentz geometry and mathematical relativity: it was observed that it is possible to understand the light-line geodesics of a (normalized, standard) stationary 4-dimensional space-time as geodesics of a certain Finsler Randers metric on a 3-dimensional manifold. The trivial projective change of the Finsler metric corresponds to the choice of another 3-dimensional slice, and the existence of a trivial projective change that is forward and backward complete is equivalent to the global hyperbolicity of the space-time.

math.DG↗

Two remarks on $PQ^ε$-projectivity of Riemannian metrics

We show that $PQ^ε$-projectivity of two Riemannian metrics introduced in \cite{Top2003} implies affine equivalence of the metrics unless $ε\in\{0,-1,-3,-5,-7,...\}$. Moreover, we show that for $ε=0$, $PQ^ε$-projectivity implies projective equivalence.

math.DG↗

Geodesically equivalent metrics in general relativity

We discuss whether it is possible to reconstruct a metric by its unparameterized geodesics, and how to do it effectively. We explain why this problem is interesting for general relativity. We show how to understand whether all curves from a sufficiently big family are umparameterized geodesics of a certain affine connection, and how to reconstruct algorithmically a generic 4-dimensional metric by its unparameterized geodesics. The algorithm works most effectively if the metric is Ricci-flat. We also prove that almost every metric does not allow nontrivial geodesic equivalence, and construct all pairs of 4-dimensional geodesically equivalent metrics of Lorenz signature.

math.DG↗