SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1707.09504

Expanding Visibility Polygons by Mirrors upto at least K units

Abstract

We consider extending visibility polygon $(VP)$ of a given point $q$ $(VP(q))$, inside a simple polygon $\P$ by converting some edges of $\P$ to mirrors. We will show that several variations of the problem of finding mirror-edges to add at least $k$ units of area to $VP(q)$ are NP-complete, or NP-hard. Which $k$ is a given value. We deal with both single and multiple reflecting mirrors, and also specular or diffuse types of reflections. In specular reflection, a single incoming direction is reflected into a single outgoing direction. In this paper diffuse reflection is regarded as reflecting lights at all possible angles from a given surface. The paper deals with finding mirror-edges to add \emph{at least} $k$ units of area to $VP(q)$. In the case of specular type of reflections we only consider single reflections, and the multiple case is still open. Specular case of the problem is more tricky. We construct a simple polygon for every given instance of a 3-SAT problem. There are some specific spikes which are visible only by some particular mirror-edges. Consequently, to have minimum number of mirror-edges it is required to choose only one of these mirrors to see a particular spike. There is a reduction polygon which contains a clause-gadget corresponding to every clause, and a variable-gadget corresponding to every variable. 3-SAT formula has $n$ variables and $m$ clauses, so the minimum number of mirrors required to add an area of at least $k$ to $V P(q)$ is $l = 3m+n+1$ if and only if the 3-SAT formula is satisfiable. This reduction works in these two cases: adding at least $k$ vertex of $\P$ to $VP(q)$, and expanding $VP(q)$ at least $k$ units of area.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Arash Vaezi, Bodhayan Roy, Mohammad Ghodsi, Anil Maheshwari. 2017-07-29. Expanding Visibility Polygons by Mirrors upto at least K units. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.09504

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG