SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2009.14473

The Online Broadcast Range-Assignment Problem

Abstract

Let $P=\{p_0,\ldots,p_{n-1}\}$ be a set of points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, modeling devices in a wireless network. A range assignment assigns a range $r(p_i)$ to each point $p_i\in P$, thus inducing a directed communication graph $G_r$ in which there is a directed edge $(p_i,p_j)$ iff $\textrm{dist}(p_i, p_j) \leq r(p_i)$, where $\textrm{dist}(p_i,p_j)$ denotes the distance between $p_i$ and $p_j$. The range-assignment problem is to assign the transmission ranges such that $G_r$ has a certain desirable property, while minimizing the cost of the assignment; here the cost is given by $\sum_{p_i\in P} r(p_i)^α$, for some constant $α>1$ called the distance-power gradient. We introduce the online version of the range-assignment problem, where the points $p_j$ arrive one by one, and the range assignment has to be updated at each arrival. Following the standard in online algorithms, resources given out cannot be taken away -- in our case this means that the transmission ranges will never decrease. The property we want to maintain is that $G_r$ has a broadcast tree rooted at the first point $p_0$. Our results include the following. - For $d=1$, a 1-competitive algorithm does not exist. In particular, for $α=2$ any online algorithm has competitive ratio at least 1.57. - For $d=1$ and $d=2$, we analyze two natural strategies: Upon the arrival of a new point $p_j$, Nearest-Neighbor increases the range of the nearest point to cover $p_j$ and Cheapest Increase increases the range of the point for which the resulting cost increase to be able to reach $p_j$ is minimal. - We generalize the problem to arbitrary metric spaces, where we present an $O(\log n)$-competitive algorithm.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mark de Berg, Aleksandar Markovic, Seeun William Umboh. 2020-09-30. The Online Broadcast Range-Assignment Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.14473

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG