SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2401.01772

A Novel Paradigm for Neural Computation: X-Net with Learnable Neurons and Adaptable Structure

Abstract

Multilayer perception (MLP) has permeated various disciplinary domains, ranging from bioinformatics to financial analytics, where their application has become an indispensable facet of contemporary scientific research endeavors. However, MLP has obvious drawbacks. 1), The type of activation function is single and relatively fixed, which leads to poor `representation ability' of the network, and it is often to solve simple problems with complex networks; 2), the network structure is not adaptive, it is easy to cause network structure redundant or insufficient. In this work, we propose a novel neural network paradigm X-Net promising to replace MLPs. X-Net can dynamically learn activation functions individually based on derivative information during training to improve the network's representational ability for specific tasks. At the same time, X-Net can precisely adjust the network structure at the neuron level to accommodate tasks of varying complexity and reduce computational costs. We show that X-Net outperforms MLPs in terms of representational capability. X-Net can achieve comparable or even better performance than MLP with much smaller parameters on regression and classification tasks. Specifically, in terms of the number of parameters, X-Net is only 3% of MLP on average and only 1.1% under some tasks. We also demonstrate X-Net's ability to perform scientific discovery on data from various disciplines such as energy, environment, and aerospace, where X-Net is shown to help scientists discover new laws of mathematics or physics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yanjie Li, Weijun Li, Lina Yu, Min Wu, Jinyi Liu, Wenqiang Li, Meilan Hao, Shu Wei, Yusong Deng, Liping Zhang, Xiaoli Dong, Hong Qin, Xin Ning, Yugui Zhang, Baoli Lu, Jian Xu, Shuang Li. 2024-01-03. A Novel Paradigm for Neural Computation: X-Net with Learnable Neurons and Adaptable Structure. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01772

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI