SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2507.13575

Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models: Tech Report 2025

Abstract

We introduce two multilingual, multimodal foundation language models that power Apple Intelligence features across Apple devices and services: i a 3B-parameter on-device model optimized for Apple silicon through architectural innovations such as KV-cache sharing and 2-bit quantization-aware training; and ii a scalable server model built on a novel Parallel-Track Mixture-of-Experts PT-MoE transformer that combines track parallelism, mixture-of-experts sparse computation, and interleaved global-local attention to deliver high quality with competitive cost on Apple's Private Cloud Compute platform. Both models are trained on large-scale multilingual and multimodal datasets sourced via responsible web crawling, licensed corpora, and high-quality synthetic data, then further refined with supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning on a new asynchronous platform. The resulting models support several additional languages while understanding images and executing tool calls. In public benchmarks and human evaluations, both the server model and the on-device model match or surpass comparably sized open baselines. A new Swift-centric Foundation Models framework exposes guided generation, constrained tool calling, and LoRA adapter fine-tuning, allowing developers to integrate these capabilities with a few lines of code. The latest advancements in Apple Intelligence models are grounded in our Responsible AI approach with safeguards like content filtering and locale-specific evaluation, as well as our commitment to protecting our users' privacy with innovations like Private Cloud Compute.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ethan Li, Anders Boesen Lindbo Larsen, Chen Zhang, Xiyou Zhou, Jun Qin, Dian Ang Yap, Narendran Raghavan, Xuankai Chang, Margit Bowler, Eray Yildiz, John Peebles, Hannah Gillis Coleman, Matteo Ronchi, Peter Gray, Keen You, Anthony Spalvieri-Kruse, Ruoming Pang, Reed Li, Yuli Yang, Emad Soroush, Zhiyun Lu, Crystal Xiao, Rong Situ, Jordan Huffaker, David Griffiths, Zaid Ahmed, Peng Zhang, Daniel Parilla, Asaf Liberman, Jennifer Mallalieu, Parsa Mazaheri, Qibin Chen, Manjot Bilkhu, Aonan Zhang, Eric Wang, Dave Nelson, Michael FitzMaurice, Thomas Voice, Jeremy Liu, Josh Shaffer, Shiwen Zhao, Prasanth Yadla, Farzin Rasteh, Pengsheng Guo, Arsalan Farooq, Jeremy Snow, Stephen Murphy, Tao Lei, Minsik Cho, George Horrell, Sam Dodge, Lindsay Hislop, Sumeet Singh, Alex Dombrowski, Aiswarya Raghavan, Sasha Sirovica, Mandana Saebi, Faye Lao, Max Lam, TJ Lu, Zhaoyang Xu, Karanjeet Singh, Marc Kirchner, David Mizrahi, Rajat Arora, Haotian Zhang, Henry Mason, Lawrence Zhou, Yi Hua, Ankur Jain, Felix Bai, Joseph Astrauskas, Floris Weers, Josh Gardner, Mira Chiang, Yi Zhang, Pulkit Agrawal, Tony Sun, Quentin Keunebroek, Matthew Hopkins, Bugu Wu, Tao Jia, Chen Chen, Xingyu Zhou, Nanzhu Wang, Peng Liu, Ruixuan Hou, Rene Rauch, Yuan Gao, Afshin Dehghan, Jonathan Janke, Zirui Wang, Cha Chen, Xiaoyi Ren, Feng Nan, Josh Elman, Dong Yin, Yusuf Goren, Jeff Lai, Yiran Fei. 2025-07-17. Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models: Tech Report 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13575

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG