Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2511.05465

Helios: A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer

Anthony Ransford·M. S. Allman·Jake Arkinstall·J. P. Campora III·Samuel F. Cooper·Robert D. Delaney·Joan M. Dreiling·Brian Estey·Caroline Figgatt·Alex Hall·Ali A. Husain·Akhil Isanaka·Colin J. Kennedy·Nikhil Kotibhaskar·Ivaylo S. Madjarov·Karl Mayer·Alistair R. Milne·Annie J. Park·Adam P. Reed·Riley Ancona·Molly P. Andersen·Pablo Andres-Martinez·Will Angenent·Liz Argueta·Benjamin Arkin·Leonardo Ascarrunz·William Baker·Corey Barnes·John Bartolotta·Jordan Berg·Ryan Besand·Bryce Bjork·Matt Blain·Paul Blanchard·Robin Blume-Kohout·Matt Bohn·Agustin Borgna·Daniel Y. Botamanenko·Robert Boutelle·Natalie Brown·Grant T. Buckingham·Nathaniel Q. Burdick·William Cody Burton·Varis Carey·Christopher J. Carron·Joe Chambers·John Children·Victor E. Colussi·Steven Crepinsek·Andrew Cureton·Joe Davies·Daniel Davis·Matthew DeCross·David Deen·Conor Delaney·Davide DelVento·B. J. DeSalvo·Jason Dominy·Ross Duncan·Vanya Eccles·Alec Edgington·Neal Erickson·Stephen Erickson·Christopher T. Ertsgaard·Bruce Evans·Tyler Evans·Maya I. Fabrikant·Andrew Fischer·Cameron Foltz·Michael Foss-Feig·David Francois·Brad Freyberg·Charles Gao·Robert Garay·Jane Garvin·David M. Gaudiosi·Christopher N. Gilbreth·Josh Giles·Erin Glynn·Jeff Graves·Azure Hansen·David Hayes·Lukas Heidemann·Bob Higashi·Tyler Hilbun·Jordan Hines·Ariana Hlavaty·Kyle Hoffman·Ian M. Hoffman·Craig Holliman·Isobel Hooper·Bob Horning·James Hostetter·Daniel Hothem·Jack Houlton·Jared Hout·Ross Hutson·Ryan T. Jacobs·Trent Jacobs·Melf Johannsen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We report on Quantinuum Helios, a 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum processor based on the quantum charge-coupled device (QCCD) architecture. Helios features $^{137}$Ba$^{+}$ hyperfine qubits, all-to-all connectivity enabled by a rotatable ion storage ring connecting two quantum operation regions by a junction, speed improvements from parallelized operations, and a new software stack with real-time compilation of dynamic programs. Averaged over all operational zones in the system, we achieve average infidelities of $2.5(1)\times10^{-5}$ for single-qubit gates, $7.9(2)\times10^{-4}$ for two-qubit gates, and $4.8(6)\times10^{-4}$ for state preparation and measurement, none of which are fundamentally limited and likely able to be improved. These component infidelities are predictive of system-level performance in both random Clifford circuits and random circuit sampling, the latter demonstrating that Helios operates well beyond the reach of classical simulation and establishes a new frontier of fidelity and complexity for quantum computers.

Explore related subjects

quant-phphysics.atom-ph

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Anthony Ransford, M. S. Allman, Jake Arkinstall, J. P. Campora III, Samuel F. Cooper, Robert D. Delaney, Joan M. Dreiling, Brian Estey, Caroline Figgatt, Alex Hall, Ali A. Husain, Akhil Isanaka, Colin J. Kennedy, Nikhil Kotibhaskar, Ivaylo S. Madjarov, Karl Mayer, Alistair R. Milne, Annie J. Park, Adam P. Reed, Riley Ancona, Molly P. Andersen, Pablo Andres-Martinez, Will Angenent, Liz Argueta, Benjamin Arkin, Leonardo Ascarrunz, William Baker, Corey Barnes, John Bartolotta, Jordan Berg, Ryan Besand, Bryce Bjork, Matt Blain, Paul Blanchard, Robin Blume-Kohout, Matt Bohn, Agustin Borgna, Daniel Y. Botamanenko, Robert Boutelle, Natalie Brown, Grant T. Buckingham, Nathaniel Q. Burdick, William Cody Burton, Varis Carey, Christopher J. Carron, Joe Chambers, John Children, Victor E. Colussi, Steven Crepinsek, Andrew Cureton, Joe Davies, Daniel Davis, Matthew DeCross, David Deen, Conor Delaney, Davide DelVento, B. J. DeSalvo, Jason Dominy, Ross Duncan, Vanya Eccles, Alec Edgington, Neal Erickson, Stephen Erickson, Christopher T. Ertsgaard, Bruce Evans, Tyler Evans, Maya I. Fabrikant, Andrew Fischer, Cameron Foltz, Michael Foss-Feig, David Francois, Brad Freyberg, Charles Gao, Robert Garay, Jane Garvin, David M. Gaudiosi, Christopher N. Gilbreth, Josh Giles, Erin Glynn, Jeff Graves, Azure Hansen, David Hayes, Lukas Heidemann, Bob Higashi, Tyler Hilbun, Jordan Hines, Ariana Hlavaty, Kyle Hoffman, Ian M. Hoffman, Craig Holliman, Isobel Hooper, Bob Horning, James Hostetter, Daniel Hothem, Jack Houlton, Jared Hout, Ross Hutson, Ryan T. Jacobs, Trent Jacobs, Melf Johannsen. 2025-11-07. Helios: A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05465

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Probing the Error-Mitigation Threshold with Matrix Product States

Quantum error mitigation relies on accurate noise characterization, but mismatches between the actual and characterized noise can be amplified and drive a sharp threshold between successful and failed mitigation. In random circuits, this threshold maps onto a random-field Ising transition, but previous exact numerics were limited to small one-dimensional and all-to-all systems, leaving explicit two-dimensional architectures unresolved. We develop a fixed-bond-dimension matrix-product-state method for the replicated transfer dynamics that extends threshold calculations beyond exact propagation while retaining the finite-size signatures of the transition. At system sizes beyond previous exact studies, we recover the predicted absence of a threshold for quenched disorder in 1D, obtain a sharper annealed all-to-all critical point, and resolve architecture-dependent finite-depth thresholds in 2D square and heavy-hex circuits. These results establish replicated tensor-network dynamics as a practical tool for probing error-mitigation thresholds in large and higher-dimensional noisy circuits.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2026

Low-cost algorithm-to-execution framework for surface-code quantum computing

The execution of useful quantum algorithms on fault-tolerant processors requires more than a mapping from logical gates to encoded operations: the spatial organization, non-Clifford resource supply, and execution schedule must also be determined while keeping physical overhead within practical limits. Although the theoretical hierarchy from logical circuits to fault-tolerant operations is well established, these implementation choices are often specified and optimized separately. Here we develop a low-cost algorithm-to-execution framework for surface-code quantum computing. From hierarchical algorithm descriptions, it constructs dependency-preserving logical schedules and an executable workload capturing logical interactions, operation parallelism, and time-resolved non-Clifford demand, thereby linking logical computation to surface-code organization, resource-state preparation, and fault-tolerant execution in a traceable workflow. We apply the framework to twenty benchmark circuits across seven algorithm families and a hierarchically composed application-scale elliptic-curve discrete-logarithm workload. Physical costs vary substantially even for circuits with similar logical resource counts. Under our direct-rotation calibration, non-Clifford implementation selection reduces space-time volume by up to 241.5 times versus an all-synthesis baseline for the QAOA amplitude-amplification workload. Circuit-specific surface-code layouts reduce routed-latency estimates for all twenty benchmarks; thirteen also reduce space-time volume because communication savings outweigh added spatial overhead. These results show that low-cost fault-tolerant execution depends on computation scheduling and organization, not aggregate logical resource counts alone.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2026

Sample-optimal learning of stabilizer states

It is well-known that learning a pure $n$-qubit stabilizer state $|\psi\rangle$ both requires, and can be accomplished with, access to a number of copies of $|\psi\rangle$ linear in $n$. However, the precise constant coefficient of this scaling does not appear to have been determined. Here we prove that $L_\delta(n)$, the smallest number of copies from which a quantum procedure can identify any stabilizer state with failure probability at most $0<\delta<1/8$, satisfies $n+\lceil\log_2(1/\delta)\rceil-3\leq L_\delta(n)\leq n+\left\lceil\log_2(1/\delta)\right\rceil+4$. We present a polynomial-time quantum learning algorithm that saturates this bound, achieving a constant factor improvement in sample-complexity over previously known approaches. As an immediate corollary, we obtain via the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism an algorithm for learning an unknown $n$-qubit Clifford unitary from $2n+\left\lceil\log_2(1/\delta)\right\rceil+4$ queries, the $n$-dependence of which we show to be optimal. Our proof technique, which involves Fourier analysis on the abelian group $\mathbb{Z}_4^n \times \mathbb{F}_2^{n(n-1)/2}$, seems to be qualitatively different to previous approaches to stabilizer state learning, and may be of some independent interest; in particular, it admits natural generalisations to further problems in quantum learning theory.

quant-ph↗