Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.07980

The Voiceprint Fallacy: Why Voices Are Not Unique Biometric Imprints

Tianle Yang·Cuiling Zhang·Chengzhe Sun·Siwei Lyu·Phil Rose
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In recent years, the term voiceprint has regained attention, particularly in technological applications and policy-making contexts, often carrying the assumption that a person's voice constitutes a stable and unique biometric trace analogous to a fingerprint. Yet this conception has been repeatedly criticized and rejected by forensic voice experts throughout the decades since its introduction. Although voices undoubtedly contain speaker-related information, this simplified conception obscures the highly dynamic and context-dependent nature of speech. This article revisits the voiceprint fallacy and reconsiders what can count as evidence of speaker identity by reviewing the historical development of voiceprint identification, evidence on human voice variability, developments in forensic voice comparison, research on human and automatic speaker recognition, and the recent challenge posed by deepfake speech to speaker identity. We point out that the voiceprint metaphor and its underlying implications are scientifically misleading because they transform a probabilistic source of speaker information into an imagined stable object of identity. We argue that speaker identity assessment does not require, and current evidence does not support, the existence of a stable and individually unique voiceprint. For speaker recognition and voice biometrics, this distinction motivates interpreting learned speaker representations with respect to the conditions under which they are trained and evaluated, and explicitly assessing their robustness to relevant sources of within-speaker variability, domain mismatch, and synthetic manipulation.

Explore related subjects

eess.AScs.CLcs.SD

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tianle Yang, Cuiling Zhang, Chengzhe Sun, Siwei Lyu, Phil Rose. 2026-08-08. The Voiceprint Fallacy: Why Voices Are Not Unique Biometric Imprints. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07980

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Diarization Error Decomposition Under Pause Annotation Ambiguity

Speaker diarization evaluation is sensitive to ambiguity in pause annotation, which can inflate diarization error rate (DER) or obscure genuine model errors. We show that morphological closing, which has been used for pause-tolerant diarization evaluation, discards segment-level distinctions. Instead, we propose an exact, overlap-aware decomposition of standard DER into a pause-attributable component, consisting of errors compatible with pause filling, and a residual core component that can serve as a proxy for intrinsic diarization errors. The decomposition leaves DER unchanged, while the pause-attributable and core components vary monotonically with the pause threshold and eventually saturate. Experiments spanning synthetic transformations, annotation mismatch, cross-domain evaluation, and tight-boundary diarization show that the decomposition reveals error sources not apparent from standard DER.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

Less can be More: What Aspects of Speech Drive End-of-Turn Detection

In conversational AI, detecting when a speaker has finished talking is crucial for natural turn taking. While recent work incorporates semantics, the relative contribution of different modalities remains unclear. We present a controlled ablation of acoustic, prosodic, and semantic signals for streaming end of turn detection using a lightweight trimodal classifier. Under identical training conditions, the acoustic prosodic combination achieves the best balance of accuracy and latency, achieving utterance F1 of 0.93 with 7.8% false alarms at 400ms median latency. Adding text increases premature detections without improving performance. Feature space analysis confirms that prosodic features have the strongest class separability, while text representations overlap substantially. These findings suggest that turn-taking is primarily conveyed through intonation and silence patterns rather than semantic completeness, enabling faster and more reliable systems without expensive text inference.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

Downstream-Task-Aware Unified Source Separation

Task-aware unified source separation (TUSS) enables a single model to handle diverse separation tasks by conditioning on input prompts. However, conventional TUSS does not account for downstream task requirements, such as whether the enhanced speech will be used for human listening or automatic speech recognition (ASR). In this paper, we propose a prompt extension framework for TUSS that incorporates downstream task information into the input prompts and switches the loss function according to the given prompt during training, enabling outputs with different signal characteristics at inference time. Specifically, we introduce an ASR-dedicated prompt paired with a regularized loss function that reduces speech artifacts to improve ASR robustness, while the standard prompt is paired with the conventional SNR loss function. Experiments on the LibriSpeech and JNAS corpora demonstrate that the proposed joint-training scheme enables a single model to improve ASR performance over noisy input across a wide range of SNR conditions by selecting the ASR-dedicated prompt, while maintaining general speech enhancement quality when the standard prompt is used.

eess.AS↗