Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.37585

Timestral

Adrien Petralia·Alexandre Gavaudan·Artjom Joosen·Etienne Goffinet·Richard Kurle·Yassine El Ouahidi·Yassir Bendou·Abdelaziz Bounhar·Abhijeet Somani·Aditi Kabra·Adrian Valente·Adrien Sadé·Ahmed Djermani·Alan Jeffares·Albert Jiang·Alberto Bietti·Aleksandr Timashov·Alexandre Cahill·Alexandre Laval·Alexandre Sablayrolles·Alexandros Sanchez Vassopoulos·Amélie Héliou·Amos You·André Jonasson·Andreas Fürst·Andrew Bai·Andrew Ehrenberg·Andrew Zhao·Andy Lo·Angele Lenglemetz·Anmol Agarwal·Antonia Calvi·Arata Suzuki·Arjun Majumdar·Arthur Fournier·Ashwani Kumar·Augustin Lombard·Avinash Sooriyarachchi·Aylin Guliz Akkus·Aysenur Karaduman·Baptiste Bout·Baptiste Rozière·Barna Pásztor·Baudouin De Monicault·Benjamin Holzschuh·Benjamin Tibi·Benno Stein·Bernhard Stadlbauer·Bhargavi Bhaskar·Binbing Hou·Błażej Osiński·Boris van Breugel·Camille Le Scao·Chaoran Yu·Charlotte Cronjäger·Chen-Yo Sun·Chris Bamford·Christian Wallenwein·Christophe Renaudin·Clémence Lanfranchi·Colin Bonatti·Corentin Barreau·Corentin Sautier·Cristiana-Diana Diaconu·Cyprien Courtot·Daniel Lopes·Daniel Marczak·Darius Dabert·Diego de las Casas·Dominik Nuss·Dylan Rubini·Dzmitry Soupel·Elizaveta Demyanenko·Elliot Chane-Sane·Emilien Fugier·Emmanuel Gottlob·Erik Aas·Etienne Duchesne·Fabian Paischer·Fabian Schlager·Faruk Ahmed·Federico Baldassarre·Félix Rosseeuw·Filip Szatkowski·Filippo Vicentini·Florian Wiesner·Gabrielle Berrada·Gaëtan Ecrepont·Gaspard Blanchet·Gaspard Donada-Vidal·Gaurav Mahajan·Gauthier Guinet·Genevieve Hayes·Georgii Novikov·Georgios Christoglou·Giada Pistilli·Gonzague de Carpentier·Graeme Nail·Guillaume Breton·Guillaume Kunsch

Abstract

We introduce Timestral, a family of four time series foundation models for probabilistic forecasting, with 5M, 28M, 123M, and 209M parameters. Timestral sets a new state of the art on GIFT-Eval, TIME, and fev-bench, where Timestral-209M and Timestral-123M take the top two places on every metric. We achieve this with three ingredients: Decoupled Horizon Forecasting (DHF), which separates prediction tokens from the causally encoded context, so that longer horizons are trained without masking context and each observed value is both a forecast target and context for later forecasts; a covariate framework that natively supports known-future covariates within a causal architecture; and a two-stage pipeline that pretrains exclusively on a diverse, large-scale synthetic corpus before post-training on a mix of real and synthetic data with extended context. This report describes the model design and its benchmark results. Weights for all four models are available on Hugging Face and inference code on GitHub.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Adrien Petralia, Alexandre Gavaudan, Artjom Joosen, Etienne Goffinet, Richard Kurle, Yassine El Ouahidi, Yassir Bendou, Abdelaziz Bounhar, Abhijeet Somani, Aditi Kabra, Adrian Valente, Adrien Sadé, Ahmed Djermani, Alan Jeffares, Albert Jiang, Alberto Bietti, Aleksandr Timashov, Alexandre Cahill, Alexandre Laval, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Alexandros Sanchez Vassopoulos, Amélie Héliou, Amos You, André Jonasson, Andreas Fürst, Andrew Bai, Andrew Ehrenberg, Andrew Zhao, Andy Lo, Angele Lenglemetz, Anmol Agarwal, Antonia Calvi, Arata Suzuki, Arjun Majumdar, Arthur Fournier, Ashwani Kumar, Augustin Lombard, Avinash Sooriyarachchi, Aylin Guliz Akkus, Aysenur Karaduman, Baptiste Bout, Baptiste Rozière, Barna Pásztor, Baudouin De Monicault, Benjamin Holzschuh, Benjamin Tibi, Benno Stein, Bernhard Stadlbauer, Bhargavi Bhaskar, Binbing Hou, Błażej Osiński, Boris van Breugel, Camille Le Scao, Chaoran Yu, Charlotte Cronjäger, Chen-Yo Sun, Chris Bamford, Christian Wallenwein, Christophe Renaudin, Clémence Lanfranchi, Colin Bonatti, Corentin Barreau, Corentin Sautier, Cristiana-Diana Diaconu, Cyprien Courtot, Daniel Lopes, Daniel Marczak, Darius Dabert, Diego de las Casas, Dominik Nuss, Dylan Rubini, Dzmitry Soupel, Elizaveta Demyanenko, Elliot Chane-Sane, Emilien Fugier, Emmanuel Gottlob, Erik Aas, Etienne Duchesne, Fabian Paischer, Fabian Schlager, Faruk Ahmed, Federico Baldassarre, Félix Rosseeuw, Filip Szatkowski, Filippo Vicentini, Florian Wiesner, Gabrielle Berrada, Gaëtan Ecrepont, Gaspard Blanchet, Gaspard Donada-Vidal, Gaurav Mahajan, Gauthier Guinet, Genevieve Hayes, Georgii Novikov, Georgios Christoglou, Giada Pistilli, Gonzague de Carpentier, Graeme Nail, Guillaume Breton, Guillaume Kunsch. 2026-10-27. Timestral. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37585

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Epsilon-Identifiability of Causal Quantities

Identifying the effects of causes and causes of effects is vital in virtually every scientific field. Often, however, the needed probabilities may not be fully identifiable from the available data sources. This paper shows how approximate identifiability is still possible for several probabilities of causation. We term this epsilon-identifiability and demonstrate its usefulness in cases where the behavior of certain subpopulations can be restricted within sufficiently narrow bounds. In particular, we show how unidentifiable causal effects and counterfactual probabilities can be epsilon-identified when such allowances are made. Often, these allowances are easily measured and reasonably assumed. Finally, epsilon-identifiability is applied to the unit selection problem.

cs.AI↗

HiMA-Ecom: A Long-Horizon Memory Benchmark for Hierarchical Multi-Agent E-commerce Assistants

Long-horizon agentic systems become long-context systems by accumulation rather than through a single long document, since every step reassembles a prompt from role instructions, tool and sub-agent descriptions, recalled memories, dialogue history, and previous tool outputs, separately for every agent. This paper studies how such accumulated context can be trained, evaluated, and managed in hierarchical multi-agent assistants. We present HiMA-Ecom, a hierarchical multi-agent benchmark for e-commerce assistants with 22.8K instances, of which 17.7K carry memory entries in context, pairing agent-specific supervised fine-tuning data with system-level supervision for end-to-end multi-agent reinforcement learning. Building upon it, HiMA-R1 keeps the context budget of a trajectory under control through Variance-Reduction Group Relative Policy Optimization (VR-GRPO), which samples along an initial trajectory so that sampling cost grows additively with trajectory length and updates the agents with the largest reward variance, together with an efficiency reward on trajectory length and a memory evolution mechanism that repurposes GRPO rewards as cost-free signals for what stays in context. Agents built upon 3B and 7B open-source models match DeepSeek-R1 and surpass DeepSeek-V3 by 6.0 points on average, while reward-driven memory reduces the update steps needed for convergence by roughly 55%.

cs.AI↗

Re4: Scientific Computing Agent with Rewriting, Resolution, Review and Revision

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated abilities to perform complex tasks in multiple domains, including mathematical and scientific reasoning. In this work, we construct a novel agent framework for solving representative problems in scientific computing. The proposed agent incorporates a "rewriting-resolution-review-revision" logical chain via three reasoning LLMs (the Consultant, Reviewer, and Programmer) in a collaborative and interactive manner. The Consultant module enables knowledge transfer to link problems to professional domain insights, thereby rewriting problem descriptions through text augmentation. The Programmer module generates and executes well-structured code to solve problems. The Reviewer module enables self-debugging and self-refinement through interactive feedback with code runtime outputs. Through the end-to-end review mechanism, the Programmer's executable code undergoes iterative revision. We comprehensively evaluate the framework on typical partial differential equations (PDEs), engineering-oriented flow past a cylinder, ill-conditioned linear systems, and data-driven physical analysis problems. Compared with a single-model approach, this collaborative framework significantly improves the bug-free code generation rate and reduces non-physical solutions, establishing a reliable framework for autonomous code generation from natural language descriptions. The review mechanism improved the average execution success (bug-free code and non-NaN solutions) rate of DeepSeek R1 from 59% to 82%, while ChatGPT 4.1-mini improved from 66% to 87% and Gemini-2.5 improved from 60% to 84%. Automatic code generation and review provide a promising workflow for scientific computing; analysis of solver-development trajectories further reveals recurring implementation difficulties in boundary treatment, array indexing, and the preservation of numerical constraints.

cs.AI↗