Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2505.16314

NTIRE 2025 challenge on Text to Image Generation Model Quality Assessment

Shuhao Han·Haotian Fan·Fangyuan Kong·Wenjie Liao·Chunle Guo·Chongyi Li·Radu Timofte·Liang Li·Tao Li·Junhui Cui·Yunqiu Wang·Yang Tai·Jingwei Sun·Jianhui Sun·Xinli Yue·Tianyi Wang·Huan Hou·Junda Lu·Xinyang Huang·Zitang Zhou·Zijian Zhang·Xuhui Zheng·Xuecheng Wu·Chong Peng·Xuezhi Cao·Trong-Hieu Nguyen-Mau·Minh-Hoang Le·Minh-Khoa Le-Phan·Duy-Nam Ly·Hai-Dang Nguyen·Minh-Triet Tran·Yukang Lin·Yan Hong·Chuanbiao Song·Siyuan Li·Jun Lan·Zhichao Zhang·Xinyue Li·Wei Sun·Zicheng Zhang·Yunhao Li·Xiaohong Liu·Guangtao Zhai·Zitong Xu·Huiyu Duan·Jiarui Wang·Guangji Ma·Liu Yang·Lu Liu·Qiang Hu·Xiongkuo Min·Zichuan Wang·Zhenchen Tang·Bo Peng·Jing Dong·Fengbin Guan·Zihao Yu·Yiting Lu·Wei Luo·Xin Li·Minhao Lin·Haofeng Chen·Xuanxuan He·Kele Xu·Qisheng Xu·Zijian Gao·Tianjiao Wan·Bo-Cheng Qiu·Chih-Chung Hsu·Chia-ming Lee·Yu-Fan Lin·Bo Yu·Zehao Wang·Da Mu·Mingxiu Chen·Junkang Fang·Huamei Sun·Wending Zhao·Zhiyu Wang·Wang Liu·Weikang Yu·Puhong Duan·Bin Sun·Xudong Kang·Shutao Li·Shuai He·Lingzhi Fu·Heng Cong·Rongyu Zhang·Jiarong He·Zhishan Qiao·Yongqing Huang·Zewen Chen·Zhe Pang·Juan Wang·Jian Guo·Zhizhuo Shao·Ziyu Feng·Bing Li·Weiming Hu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper reports on the NTIRE 2025 challenge on Text to Image (T2I) generation model quality assessment, which will be held in conjunction with the New Trends in Image Restoration and Enhancement Workshop (NTIRE) at CVPR 2025. The aim of this challenge is to address the fine-grained quality assessment of text-to-image generation models. This challenge evaluates text-to-image models from two aspects: image-text alignment and image structural distortion detection, and is divided into the alignment track and the structural track. The alignment track uses the EvalMuse-40K, which contains around 40K AI-Generated Images (AIGIs) generated by 20 popular generative models. The alignment track has a total of 371 registered participants. A total of 1,883 submissions are received in the development phase, and 507 submissions are received in the test phase. Finally, 12 participating teams submitted their models and fact sheets. The structure track uses the EvalMuse-Structure, which contains 10,000 AI-Generated Images (AIGIs) with corresponding structural distortion mask. A total of 211 participants have registered in the structure track. A total of 1155 submissions are received in the development phase, and 487 submissions are received in the test phase. Finally, 8 participating teams submitted their models and fact sheets. Almost all methods have achieved better results than baseline methods, and the winning methods in both tracks have demonstrated superior prediction performance on T2I model quality assessment.

Explore related subjects

cs.CVcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shuhao Han, Haotian Fan, Fangyuan Kong, Wenjie Liao, Chunle Guo, Chongyi Li, Radu Timofte, Liang Li, Tao Li, Junhui Cui, Yunqiu Wang, Yang Tai, Jingwei Sun, Jianhui Sun, Xinli Yue, Tianyi Wang, Huan Hou, Junda Lu, Xinyang Huang, Zitang Zhou, Zijian Zhang, Xuhui Zheng, Xuecheng Wu, Chong Peng, Xuezhi Cao, Trong-Hieu Nguyen-Mau, Minh-Hoang Le, Minh-Khoa Le-Phan, Duy-Nam Ly, Hai-Dang Nguyen, Minh-Triet Tran, Yukang Lin, Yan Hong, Chuanbiao Song, Siyuan Li, Jun Lan, Zhichao Zhang, Xinyue Li, Wei Sun, Zicheng Zhang, Yunhao Li, Xiaohong Liu, Guangtao Zhai, Zitong Xu, Huiyu Duan, Jiarui Wang, Guangji Ma, Liu Yang, Lu Liu, Qiang Hu, Xiongkuo Min, Zichuan Wang, Zhenchen Tang, Bo Peng, Jing Dong, Fengbin Guan, Zihao Yu, Yiting Lu, Wei Luo, Xin Li, Minhao Lin, Haofeng Chen, Xuanxuan He, Kele Xu, Qisheng Xu, Zijian Gao, Tianjiao Wan, Bo-Cheng Qiu, Chih-Chung Hsu, Chia-ming Lee, Yu-Fan Lin, Bo Yu, Zehao Wang, Da Mu, Mingxiu Chen, Junkang Fang, Huamei Sun, Wending Zhao, Zhiyu Wang, Wang Liu, Weikang Yu, Puhong Duan, Bin Sun, Xudong Kang, Shutao Li, Shuai He, Lingzhi Fu, Heng Cong, Rongyu Zhang, Jiarong He, Zhishan Qiao, Yongqing Huang, Zewen Chen, Zhe Pang, Juan Wang, Jian Guo, Zhizhuo Shao, Ziyu Feng, Bing Li, Weiming Hu. 2025-05-22. NTIRE 2025 challenge on Text to Image Generation Model Quality Assessment. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16314

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

HiPerViT: A Hierarchical Perceiver-Vision Transformer Architecture for Multi-Scale Texture Recognition

Texture recognition remains challenging for modern vision models because discriminative evidence is often carried by higher-order spatial statistics rather than by object shape alone. While Vision Transformers provide strong long-range modeling capacity, their standard object-centric representations do not explicitly expose such statistical structure, which limits texture sensitivity in fine-grained recognition settings. We present HiPerViT, a compact vision-only architecture that injects an explicit second-order statistical prior into a transformer-based recognition pipeline. The method combines global and local image views with a compact bilinear descriptor encoded as a statistical token, and integrates this token with first-order spatial representations through Perceiver-style latent distillation. This design enables direct interaction between spatial tokens and second-order feature co-occurrence statistics, providing the model with explicit access to texture-relevant information without requiring multimodal pretraining or ensemble construction. Across six texture recognition benchmarks, HiPerViT achieves consistent improvements over strong vision-only baselines under the reported evaluation protocols, including gains of +3.05 percentage points on DTD, +10.48 on GTOS-Mobile, and +10.10 on 1200Tex. Beyond benchmark performance, our analyses show that these gains are largely invariant to the backbone depth used to extract second-order statistics and to the ordering of interaction and distillation stages. This pattern suggests that the primary source of improvement is not a specific fusion topology, but the explicit availability of second-order statistical information as a first-class representational signal. These results support explicit statistical tokenization as an effective and robust design principle for texture-centric visual recognition.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

CamPilot: A Multi-Agent Cinematic Assistant for Camera-Controlled Movie Generation

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into video generation has enabled rapid text-to-video creation and improved visual quality. However, it still falls short of professional filmmaking, where cinematographic language is less refined than human-crafted camera work and multi-shot continuity remains challenging. To address these limitations, we introduce CamPilot, a multi-agent framework that integrates cinematographic planning and camera-work control to produce more coherent, logically structured, and human-aesthetic movies. CamPilot adopts a GRPO-based learning paradigm to learn camera work planning from 14K real-world professional movies, internalizing motion patterns and composition principles that support reasoning over shooting techniques (e.g., camera angle, motion, and focal behavior) and cross-shot relationships for controllable camera-viewpoint generation. Multiple agents further collaborate and evolve to improve overall output quality. To support this work and further studies in this domain, we establish CamEval, a benchmark for evaluating camera work quality and cinematic engagement. Empirical results show that CamPilot outperforms state-of-the-art text-to-movie generation methods on cinematographic control and quality, highlighting the impact of professional camera design on movie generation.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

New Evidence, Same Choice: Testing Physical Experiment Selection in Vision Language Models

A model first sees an image from one physical measurement experiment, such as how far a block coasted, and must answer a question about a new trial, such as whether the block will pass a target after a fixed push. The initial experiment may provide enough information to answer, or the model may need another measurement, such as the object's mass, friction, restitution, or spring stiffness. We study whether vision language models can decide when to answer immediately and, when more evidence is needed, which experiment to perform. Current physical reasoning benchmarks usually evaluate only the final answer, so they do not directly measure this decision-making ability. We introduce a controlled evaluation where each problem provides one measurement image and four possible physical worlds created by combining two possible masses and two possible values of another relevant property. The model must either stop and answer or select the cheapest additional experiment that can resolve the question. We construct matched problem pairs where changing either the observed measurement or the question changes the optimal action. Since all possible worlds and experiment costs are known, we can explicitly determine the optimal choice. Across six open models and 144 physical parameter sets, direct responses repeat the same action for 95.1% to 100% of image pairs even when the correct action changes. Brief reasoning improves action switching, but the best model makes both decisions correctly for only 5.9% of image pairs. Additional analysis reveals failures in measurement interpretation, physical reasoning, and response formatting. By evaluating evidence selection separately from final answers, our benchmark reveals limitations in physical reasoning that conventional answer accuracy can overlook.

cs.CV↗